Laserfiche WebLink
-r <br /> Joel C. Cantrick <br /> Page 2 <br /> time Resources applied for its permit . " However, in response to <br /> Request for Admission 2, Robert Delaney admits that he has <br /> "represented" Resources in front of the Board, but Diane Delaney <br /> and John Reeves deny that they have done so. <br /> If the Defendants are attempting to make some sort of <br /> distinction between "appearing" and "representing, " then they <br /> have misread the interrogatory. Interrogatory No. 12 asks <br /> whether the Defendants have "represented" Resources in front of <br /> the Board. Please clarify the Defendants, position on this <br /> issue as soon as possible, but no later than March 17, 1995 . <br /> In addition, please identify the person referred to as "I" <br /> on pages 3 and 10 of your supplemental responses . <br /> Pursuant to Judge Jones, ruling and in light of the <br /> continued tight schedule of this case, please provide responses <br /> to the following interrogatories, requests for production of <br /> documents, and requests for admissions by March 17, 1995 . We <br /> would like to review the requested documents on March 20, 21, and <br /> 22, 1995 . Please inform me of the time and place in which we can <br /> inspect the documents on these dates . References to "individual <br /> defendants" means John A. Reeves, Diane Delaney, and Robert <br /> Delaney. <br /> I . Individual Defendants <br /> Please respond, and produce all documents related thereto, <br /> to interrogatory nos . 5 (a) , 6 (d) , 7, 14 , 25, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, <br /> 40, 48 , 49, 50, 51, 52, as they pertain to the individual <br /> defendants, Mid-Continent Resources and Mid-Continent Minerals; <br /> to the extent that the individual defendants, records show and to <br /> the extent of their knowledge, interrogatory nos . 11, 12 , 13 , 21, <br /> 29, 30 ; interrogatory nos . 28 , 32, 33 , and 38, to the extent that <br /> they show the relationship between Resources and Minerals; <br /> interrogatory no. 26 and interrogatory no. 27 (in your fax of <br /> February 21, 1995, you stated you would respond to Interrogatory <br /> No. 27, but failed to do so in your supplemental response) . <br /> Request for Production of documents Nos . 1, 2, 3 , 4 , 23 , 24 , <br /> 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 , 32 , 34, 35, as the requests apply to the <br /> individual defendants, Minerals and Resources . <br /> Requests for Admission No. 17 . In your February 21, 1995, <br /> letter you stated that you would admit or deny this request . In <br /> your supplemental responses, you have failed to do so. <br />