My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-10-18_REVISION - C1980004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1980004
>
2012-10-18_REVISION - C1980004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:09:37 PM
Creation date
10/19/2012 7:39:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/18/2012
Doc Name
Adequacy Response #1
From
J.E. Stover & Associates, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR2
Email Name
MPB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Boulay -31- October 16, 2012 <br />need to be updated at the conclusion of the application review process and <br />an approval letter from the BLM should be retained as an Appendix to the <br />PAP, if appropriate. <br />MCM: No longer applicable, no surface expansion is being proposed. <br />81. Figure 4.1 -1, Pre and Post Mining Land Use, does not show the topography of <br />the new proposed coal waste pile. Please include the proposed waste pile in <br />Figure 4.1 -1. <br />MCM: No longer applicable, expanded coal waste pile is no longer being proposed. <br />Figure 4.1 -1 will revert back to approved Figure 4.1 -1. Figure 4.1 -1 was digitized <br />for the initial PR -02 submittal and will be included in this adequacy response as <br />the permit boundary/coal lease boundary has been revised. <br />Rule 2.05.6(2) Fish and Wildlife Plan <br />82. The Division received a letter from the CDOW dated January 6, 2011 (attached) <br />outlining discrepancies in the wildlife report. Please provide a response to <br />each of the items outlined in the letter. <br />MCM: CDOW's letter was in regard to the surface expansion and the surface <br />expansion is no longer proposed. Therefore a response to this question is no <br />longer applicable. <br />83. The DOW letter dated July 16, 2010 referenced in this section is in the Fruita <br />Loadout permit file. Please include a copy of this letter in McClane PR -2 <br />permit and reference appropriately. Also include, in the McClane permit, <br />the CDOW letter dated January 6, 2011 (attached, same as above) which is <br />an updated follow -up to the July 6, 2010 letter. <br />MCM: CDOW's letter was in regard to the surface expansion and the surface <br />expansion is no longer proposed. Therefore a response to this question is no <br />longer applicable. <br />84. It is not clear in the permit application whether the electric poles will have to be <br />moved to accommodate the coal waste pile. Please clarify. If they are being <br />moved, include the mitigation plan for the poles being used as raptor <br />perches. <br />MCM: No longer applicable. A new surface expansion is no longer being proposed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.