Laserfiche WebLink
MINESITE INSPECTION NARRATIVE 10 <br /> B. There was inlet erosion on both of the ponds, otherwise <br /> the structures appeared to be stable. Pond B was discharging <br /> clear water. DMG issued an NOV for "Failure to construct and <br /> maintain sediment ponds according to the design in the <br /> approved permit. " Although DMG issued the NOV addressing the <br /> noncompliance, after further review it appears that the pond <br /> numbers may be incorrect. The ponds below the 11 mine are <br /> labeled as pond #1 on Exhibit #2. DMG had planned to review <br /> the NOVs' to make sure all the information was correct and <br /> modify the NOVs' to reflect any changes needed. <br /> NUMBER 2 MINE <br /> Structures are also remaining on the #2 mine. The runoff from <br /> the portal area was being diverted to ponds la and lb. The <br /> runoff from pad 3 , which is below the #2 mine and was once the <br /> location of a coal storage silo, flows into two ponds also <br /> connected in a series. DMG has referred to these ponds as <br /> number 022. The lower pond, which will be called B, was <br /> discharging clear water. The upper pond had been cleaned in <br /> the past and the material had been placed to the side of the <br /> pond. Runoff from the pond cleanings leaves the area without <br /> any sediment treatment. DMG addressed this violation in an <br /> NOV citing "Failure to pass all surface drainage from the <br /> disturbed area through a sedimentation pond, a series of ponds <br /> or a treatment facility before leaving the permit area. " It <br /> should also be noted that the drawings for these structures <br /> were not accurate even though they were stamped by a <br /> registered engineer. <br /> NUMBER 3 MINE <br /> Gary Fritz, Donna Griffin, Larry Routten, and Bruce Collins <br /> made an effort to drive the access road to mine 3 . However, <br /> the upper most limits of the site were still snow covered in <br /> places to the extent that travel was limited to walking the <br /> last mile. The mine portal pad was also covered with snow to <br /> the extent that it was not possible to determine the condition <br /> or amount of water in two sediment control structures on the <br /> pad. A portion of the northern perimeter drainage control <br /> ditch was exposed; it appeared to be intact and functioning as <br /> designed. We did not attempt to check the condition of the <br /> sediment control structures at the foot of the north side of <br /> the mine portal pad because of the snow. It did not appear as <br /> though any additional reclamation of the pad facilities had <br /> occurred since my 1984 inspection. The salvage reclamation <br /> crew had pulled out a compressor from one of the buildings, <br /> but this appears as though it was the only thing done in the <br /> interim. MidContinent was still mining at the time, but were <br />