My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (136)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (136)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 7:24:56 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 11:26:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NT Op <br /> sp United States Department of the Interior AMERICAiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br /> H O <br /> � a <br /> OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING m� <br /> MACH � Reclamation and Enforcement <br /> Washington,D.C.20240 <br /> Mr. Mike Mechau MAR 2 3 1994 <br /> Crystal Valley Environmental <br /> Protection Association, Inc. R <br /> Route #1 AR 81994 <br /> 3542 Front Street Pa sade, Colorado 81526 /��4���rro�' <br /> Y <br /> Dear Mr. Mechau: <br /> This is in response to your request for an informal review of the Office of Surface Mining <br /> Reclamation and Enforcement's (OSM) Albuquerque Field Office (AFO) January 5, 1994, <br /> determination on a ten-day notice (TDN) concerning Coal Basin Mine, Mid-Continent <br /> Resources, Inc. Your original complaint, dated December 3, 1993, and your request for <br /> informal review allege that the final reclamation plan for the Coal Basin Mine failed to <br /> provide for permanent closure of the haul road which would result in erosion and sediment <br /> pollution. You also were concerned that motor vehicle traffic would cause damage and be <br /> incompatible with U.S. Forest Service (USFS) post-mining land uses. <br /> In response to your complaint and the TDN, the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br /> (DMG) submitted a letter dated December 22, 1993, outlining DMG's actions relating to your <br /> complaint. That letter stated that DMG had received notification that USFS wished to discuss <br /> an alternative road reclamation plan. <br /> On February 3, 1994, a public meeting was held to discuss alternative reclamation plans. <br /> A reclamation plan revision is currently being drafted by DMG and will be made available to <br /> USFS and AFO for comment. it is my understanding that AFO and DMG have agreed to <br /> share with you the revised reclamation plan when it becomes available. <br /> Accordingly, 1 affirm the AFO's determination that the DMG response to the TDN was <br /> appropriate. DMG is addressing your concern over haul road reclamation through discussions <br /> with the USFS (the landowner) regarding revisions to the reclamation plan. <br /> If you do not agree with this decision concerning your complaint, you have the right under <br /> 43 CFR §4.1281 et se . to appeal to the Office of Hearings and Appeals. If you wish to <br /> appeal this decision, your written notice must be filed within 20 days from receipt of this <br /> decision with this office and with the Office of Hearings and Appeals, Board of Land <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.