My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (148)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (148)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 7:44:15 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 10:07:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FROM Panasonic TAD/FAX PHONE NO. : 9454958 Jun. 30 1994 12:11PM P03 <br /> }1 iIM-�b�VTIN�I�1T ]KILSOUNCES <br /> P.O.Box Inn <br /> Glenwood Springs,CO 01602 <br /> (2m) 94&4968 <br /> June 29, 1994 <br /> Steve Renner <br /> Division of Minerals & Geology <br /> 1313 Sherman St. <br /> Room 215 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> RE: Request for Minor Revision -Alternative Discharge Point. <br /> Dear Mr. Renner: <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. (C-81-017) requests a minor revision to allow routing of <br /> flows from the rock tunnel to discharge point 029, rather than to discharge point 016. <br /> Discharge point 029 was included in the recent CDES permit renewal to allow for this <br /> alternate routing of the water which drains to the surface through the tunnel. <br /> Our intention is to use Discharge Point 029 during the time that reclamation work is <br /> being done on the rock tunnel fill area. We anticipate that this work will include <br /> grading, topsoiling, and application of seed and mulch. These activities will probably <br /> cause material to fall into the ditch which runs alongside, and which presently carries <br /> the flows from the tunnel to the sediment ponds above the 016 outfall. This could block <br /> the ditch, presenting a maintenance headache, and would cause more material to go <br /> into the sediment ponds, which would ultimately increase the expense of pond <br /> cleaning. It seems, therefore, preferable to simply re-route the water while the work is <br /> done, and thus avoid such potential problems. <br /> The water coming from the tunnel is extremely clear, and well below the discharge <br /> limits for TSS. It therefore does not require treatment(i.e. the sediment ponds). <br /> Attached is a map showing the alternate route to the 029 discharge point and a list from <br /> the CDES permit of permitted discharge points, including 029. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Yours truly, <br /> Diane Delaney <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.