My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (144)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (144)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 7:39:27 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 8:16:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 23, 1985 <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> Mid-Continent NOV C-84-094 <br /> Page Two <br /> II . PENALTY ASSESSMENT <br /> A. History: <br /> Based on the fact that one violation was issued against <br /> Mid-Continent Coal Resources within the 12 months prior to this <br /> NOV, an assessment of $50.00 is recommended. <br /> B. Seriousness: <br /> The Division based its proposed assessment of $400.00 for <br /> seriousness upon a consideration of a low-to-moderate obstruction <br /> to enforcement. Information presented at the hearing indicated a <br /> very low obstruction to enforcement occurred as a result of this <br /> violation. Therefore, I would recommend an assessment of $250.00 <br /> for seriousness. <br /> C. Fault: <br /> The Division proposed a maximum assessment for negligence based on <br /> a belief that the diversion of water around the Arctic Circle <br /> sediment ponds bordered on willfull conduct. Information presented <br /> at the hearing indicated that the diversion was a proper emergency <br /> abatement action, and as such, warranted an assessment of $250.00 <br /> for minimal negligence. <br /> D. Good Faith: <br /> Although the operator could legitimately remove the Arctic Circle <br /> ponds, since they are not required to treat runoff from the haul <br /> roads, and permitting and monitoring requirements for ponds <br /> included in mine plans is burdensome, it is a sign of good faith <br /> that the operator has retained the Arctic Circle ponds as a <br /> best-available treatment approach for road runoff. I recommend an <br /> award of $100.00 for good faith. <br /> E. Total Assessment: <br /> I recommend a total assessment for NOV 84-094 of $450.00. <br /> /wjh <br /> cc: Jim Herron <br /> 7009F <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.