My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (143)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (143)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 7:37:51 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 8:05:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�XK�r3I (� <br /> • -I1- <br /> NOV C-84-087 <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> I. FINDING OF VIOLATION <br /> During the May, 1984 inspection, Jim Herron, of the Mined Land <br /> Reclamation Division, observed that topsoil which had been stockpiled <br /> during construction of an exploration pad had not been salvaged. The <br /> topsoil had been placed along the edge of the wash plant slurry pond. <br /> Also, it was observed that topsoil removed during construction of a <br /> drainage ditch south of the warehouse was not picked up and transported <br /> to an approved topsoil stockpile. These two observations are the basis <br /> upon which NOV C-84-087 was issued. <br /> Although trace amounts of topsoil were spilled onto the banks of the <br /> slurry pond, it is not clear that such spillage could have been avoided <br /> even if topsoil salvage would have occurred immediately after the drill <br /> rig departed. There is no evidence that the operator did not intend to <br /> salvage this topsoil material . No appreciable amount of topsoil was <br /> lost at this site. <br /> The operator claimed that the material which was stockpiled adjacent to <br /> the drainage ditch was also scheduled for removal and stockpiling in an <br /> approved location. Since no information to the contrary, was <br /> presented, and no topsoil was contaminated or lost during salvage <br /> operations, there is considerable doubt as to whether a violation <br /> occurred here, either. <br /> Based on oral testimony, slides, and photographs presented by the <br /> Division and the operator, the Director vacates NOV C-84-087. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.