My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (143)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (143)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 7:37:51 AM
Creation date
10/17/2012 8:05:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�cKNC61T - <br /> -7- <br /> NOV C-84-085 <br /> Mid-continent Resources, Inc. <br /> I. FINDING OF VIOLATION <br /> On May 21 , 1984, Jim Herron, of the Mined Land Reclamation Division, <br /> observed numerous problems with respect to protection of the hydrologic <br /> balance in the vicinity of the Mid-Continent Resources prep plant <br /> operation. Notice of Violation (NOV) C-84-085, was issued which cited <br /> 13 separate instances of failure to minimize disturbance to the <br /> prevailing hydrologic balance. The citations included examples of <br /> failure to maintain sediment ponds and drainage ditches, failure to <br /> pass drainage from disturbed areas through the approved sediment <br /> control system, and failure to properly control oil and grease spills. <br /> Three of the 13 problems cited were deemed inappropriate following a <br /> presentation by the operator of information relating to hydrologic <br /> conditions at the mine site immediately prior to and during the <br /> inspection of May 21 . This information was compiled by the firm of <br /> Wright Water Engineers. While this report has not been analyzed in <br /> detail by staff hydrologists, several conclusions contained within the <br /> report were accepted for the purposes of this settlement. <br /> In general , it is accepted that Coal Basin experienced extremely heavy <br /> snowfall accumulations during the winter months of 1984. Also, <br /> basin-specific climatic data was presented which indicated that this <br /> heavy snowpack melted almost entirely in the two weeks preceding and <br /> the week during the inspection. Based upon the LOG Pearson method of <br /> runoff analysis, which was performed specifically for Coal Basin, it <br /> appears that, one week prior to the inspection, the peak flows from <br /> runoff exceeded the amount expected from a 10-year 24-hour storm event <br /> for three consecutive days. <br /> Finally, it was concluded from the Wright Water Engineers report that <br /> antecedent soil moisture conditions in Coal Basin were extremely high <br /> during the time of the inspection. <br /> Two of the citations in the NOV related to observations that, at some <br /> time in the recent past, water had bypassed ditches or culverts. The <br /> specific citations are presented below: <br /> A culvert over Bear Creek transfers water between Ponds 2 and 3 of <br /> the four in series at Discharge Point 001 . It was observed that at <br /> some time the water exiting this culvert entered the adjacent <br /> undistb rbed drainage ditch and bypassed Ponds 3 and 4. The <br /> operator redefined the ditch between the culvert outlet and Pond 3 <br /> to minimize reoccurrence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.