2012-10-16_REVISION - M2004009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(Responses to all Notifications are contained below with accompanying "proofs ", rather than also at the end of Adequacy Review requests) Following this explanation is proof that both the Weld County BOCC and the Longmont Conservation Board received both a copy of a revised Notice of Filing Application and a revised Exhibit Q that were received on 8 -31 -12 and 9 -4 -12 respectively. Per the DRMS request, the primary future land use is shown as Industrial /Commercial on the revised app form and the reclaimed land use (Ex. Q) is shown to be Agricultural /Industrial. As of October 3, 2012, no one has viewed the application materials in Greeley. The original proof of filings with both entities was submitted with the application, as the application was deemed complete by the DRMS. Following these revised documents is the original Affidavit of Publication from the Longmont Times -Call newspaper showing the public notice was published in the paper for the proper amount of time and on the specific dates required. The DRMS was copied on this affidavit previously by e -mail. Following the Affidavit is a copy of the memo that was sent to all property owners within 200 ft. of the permit area and to all easement/ROW /lease holders, etc. within the permit area. This included all utility companies, a ditch company, oil and gas transmission companies and all oil and gas production companies. Following the memo is a list ( "Businesses ") of those entities and proofs that those entities received the notification by Certified Letter. Anadarko was the only company that contacted ASCI and we sent them (Terry Enright) a reclamation plan map that also showed the oil and gas operations areas. Following the notices to businesses is a list obtained from the Weld County property information services (through 8 -3 -2012) of adjacent property owners within 200 ft. of the permit area and proofs that those property owners received the notification by Certified Letter. There was only one property owner who no longer is in the area and the Certified Letter was returned to ASCI. RL EXHIBIT A - Legal Description (Rule 6.4.1): Adequate as submitted EXHIBIT B - Index Map (Rule 6.4.2): Adequate as submitted EXHIBIT C - Pre - mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands (Rule 6.4.3): Adequate as submitted Two changes have been made to the Mining Plan Maps in the form of the new floodplain boundary being shown and the increased setback from SH -52 being returned to the map as in 2006. PFW EXHIBIT D - Mining Plan (Rule 6.4.4): What are the current projected amounts of overburden and saleable material to be removed from each of the remaining cells to be mined? What assumptions /configurations have been used to calculate that enough material can be /will be excavated and sold to allow