My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-02-18_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1986-02-18_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/26/2020 6:17:09 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 9:22:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
2/18/1986
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXHIBIT 6 <br /> ,`�' M r►ti <br /> United States Department of the Interior <br /> o OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br /> RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT <br /> 219 CENTRAL AVENUE,NW <br /> M" <br /> ALBUQUERQUE,NEW MEXICO 87102 <br /> August 29 , 1985 <br /> �i7�� t.� t� y. � ti <br /> �— <br /> Fred Banta, Coal Supervisor SFr i�o <br /> Department of Natural Resources <br /> Mine Land Reclamation MINED LANE) <br /> 423 Centennial Building RECLAMATION DIVISIC <br /> 1313 Sherman Street <br /> Denver, Colo 80203 <br /> Re : MLRD response to Ten-Day Notice (TDN ) #85-2-244-6 , TV 3, <br /> Midcontinent' s Coal Basin Mines <br /> Dear Mr . Banta : <br /> The Office of Surface Mining (OSM) has reviewed your offices <br /> response to violation #1 of the above mentioned TDN , and <br /> finds it to be inappropriate . <br /> The design criteria for the BAT ponds requires that the <br /> ponds discharge in a series . Your assumption that the flows <br /> from this series of impoundments still passes through a pond <br /> series ( the Arctic Circle pond system) has no bearing on the <br /> violation because the approved design shows them discharging <br /> in a series . The area will be re-inspected by OSM . As for <br /> the topsoil issue, OSM should have written a separate <br /> violation in the TDN to address the loss as noted. This <br /> matter is being corrected, TDN #85-2-244-12 is enclosed for <br /> the company' s failure to salvage topsoil during this mining <br /> operation . <br /> OSM' s review of your office' s response to violation #2 also <br /> is inappropriate. Records examined at the mine office shows <br /> that material less than six (6 ) inches was to be used in the <br /> embankment, however, visual inspection of the surface area <br /> indicates that material greater than that was placed in the <br /> embankment. It should be noted that the compaction test <br /> result forms only reports what the compaction results are <br /> and does not certify the gradation of the lift that was <br /> tested . OSM is also reluctant to accept the results of the <br /> nuclear densiometer tests for this type of fill due the <br /> occurrence of the rocks . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.