Laserfiche WebLink
inches for OUR PRIME TOPSOIL. S and look and putt t back. You put <br />cannot help it if they stole it and the S TATE would not come <br />a combination of 22 inches> This is outrageous. <br />Mr. Klein, look for your self. Our soils, call up Jim Boyd at NRCS and he will tell you that our <br />soils were extremely rich and thick and an average of 54 inches just for our BARX DARVEY If <br />you don't call up Jim Boyd, I will. This is ridiculous and such a lie'. ? `We had deep, rich <br />soils. They came up with the 22 inches of combined lift because when I called the State and <br />had them quit stealing our soils what was LEFT was 22 inches of our soils. The rest was put on <br />Bensons and I have a ton of witnesses. They stole our soils and put on Bensons for 3 days and <br />three nights, 100 ton per truck and 90 trucks per day. When they quit, we had 22 inches of <br />combined lift left on this place.. <br />Here even the state says We have 3 feet of lift A. Why are we getting 17 inches back. We have <br />alfalfa roots through the entire thickness of lift A and B. Lift B is 5 to 10 feet. Now remember <br />this is the STATES statements. Alfalfa roots through the entire thickness. Does this sound like <br />PASTURE or DRYLAND? Why are we only getting 26 inches of lift B if we have 5 to 10 <br />feet ? ?? Then the BENCH one material another 30 feet which they state is stacked along our <br />berm. This is not true, that is why we called in the first place. They are stacking ours on Lloyds <br />and WFC and not on us like they should be. They did quit when Mr. Berry called. Thank you. <br />The law state that a MINIMUM of 48 inches or OR EQUAL to the DEPTH that was in the <br />NATURAL SOIL BEFORE MINING. TA�WFCW FFIC�WIT'H N�►R` CIIDA, DANA�DED <br />RIGHT AT MORGANS TABLE <br />SANDY BROWN. All of them agreed that they would take a minimum AND what ever else <br />was there would and could be salvaged. T his did not mean to give to the neighbors again. <br />Equal to the depth of the Natural soil. Equal to the depth of the natural soil before mining! <br />Why would we want them t °OUR PROPERTY BACK TO THE CONDITIONS fought day <br />one. If it is there, save it. PUT <br />EXISTED PRIOR TO MINING IN AS GOOD AS OR BETTER CONDITION. <br />The laws state that the SUBSTITUTE must be EQUAL or BETTER than what we had. How is <br />raising the salt content better than what we had ?? MR. Dearstyne of NRCS said there is NO <br />WAY TO DUPLICATE THE BARX DARVEY SOILS THAT WE HAD! He said that they can <br />develope a suitable subsoil for SOME plant growths but if the salt content is raised, it may not be <br />the best for what WE RAISE. Y OUR PRIME FARMi -`AND D IS VERY DETRIMENTAL <br />SO HARD TO DISQUALIUF <br />TO US!!!! They screwedand don't know how to fix without changing all of the rules, <br />regualtions, and laws to suit themselves. WHY ARE YOU ALLOWING THIS ? ?? <br />Permit revision #5 used a TWO -SOIL lift. How do they get by with using a MINOR revision to <br />change this ? ?? HOW? Minor Revision- Means a modificatioii a permit provision to reflect <br />minor alteration in the location of roads or other facilities WHICH SHALL NOT CAUSE A <br />SIGNIFICANT ALTERATION IN THE PERMIT PLAN. How do they change atwo -lift <br />operation to a one-lift operation and state that this is not a SIGNIFICANT change???? ` � No <br />' �S l►12 l^llo � v1 O f Y1 �O r r� l� Y-n <br />