My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-10-04_REVISION - M1995030
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1995030
>
2012-10-04_REVISION - M1995030
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 6:00:11 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 12:27:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1995030
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/4/2012
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
McAtee Construction Company
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
MAC
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Gebhart <br />Page 12 <br />October 4, 2012 <br />6.4.3 Exhibit C — Pre - mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands <br />No comment. <br />6.4.4 Exhibit D — Mining Plan <br />2. The applicant has stated that the dredge is capable of mining to depths of 60 ft. Exhibit C -1 <br />shows the reclaimed lake in Stage I will be 50 ft. deep. Please clarify if the gravel deposit <br />will be mined to a depth of 60ft. and then backfilled to a depth of 50ft. or if the gravel deposit <br />will only be mined to a depth of 50ft. <br />3. The applicant has stated that mining with a dredge results in pit walls with a natural angle of <br />repose of 2.5H:1V. The applicant also states that the mining method will result in an <br />overhang which will need to be removed using explosives. Please clarify this discrepancy. <br />4. The applicant has stated the mining line will be set 75 ft. inside of the 25 ft. mining setback, <br />for a total offset of 100 ft. from the permit boundary. If the gravel deposit is mined to a depth <br />of 60 ft. and sloughing will occur resulting in an angle of repose 2.5H:1 V, then there is the <br />potential the top bank of the mine face could extend 150 ft. from the mining line. Please <br />clarify how the proposed offset of 75 ft. will allow the Operator to maintain the 25 ft. setback <br />from the permit boundary. <br />5. The Mining Plan states that at any given time no more than 5 acres will need to be <br />revegetated. The Reclamation Plan states that the plant site will be resoiled and revegetated if <br />it does not remain following the completion of reclamation. Until such time as the Operator <br />receives approval to locate an asphalt /concrete batch plant on the site, the total area requiring <br />revegetation must include the 7.22 acre plant site. Please revise Page 9 of the application <br />accordingly. <br />6. The applicant has identified rangeland as the post- mining land use. In addition, the applicant <br />has stated an asphalt/concrete batch plant may be located on the site and may remain after <br />reclamation is complete. In order for the asphalt/concrete batch plant to remain on site the <br />approved post- mining land use(s) must include industrial /commercial. The applicant may <br />designate industrial /commercial as a post- mining land use during the review of this <br />application. Otherwise, an Amendment would need to be filed and approved to include the <br />industrial /commercial post- mining land use at a later date. Please respond. <br />7. The applicant has stated that explosives will be used during the mining operation. In <br />accordance with Rule 6.4.4(i), the applicant must demonstrate through appropriate blasting, <br />vibration, geotechnical and structural engineering analyses, that off -site areas will not be <br />adversely affected by blasting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.