Laserfiche WebLink
F'A��E 4 <br /> Operators representative was advised that the materials are <br /> marginally stockpiled in a stable configuration. The operators <br /> representative was further advised to respect t;, - ensure that activities with <br /> topsoil removal and stockpiling are more carefully <br /> undertaken so that theYe i s nc;t a <br /> observed the same sort of question as to stability. We <br /> north end of the Suety Refuse Pile <br /> at the topsoil stockpile at the <br /> B bed coal storage area. Pi 1 e and the tonsol 1 Stockpile near the <br /> Sediment Fend OJE3 <br /> At this sediment pond we observed that the emergency <br /> filled with earth materials such that its ability to pass the was <br /> discharge would be restricted. The S Paste the design <br /> ineffective as a result Of Pond ,- Spillway was renedered <br /> The tare track. P- 'leaning during the summer of 1986. <br /> a from the dragline used to clean the Rand were <br /> evident . As a result the Division representative issued NOV i_-87- <br /> 026. <br /> Culverts: <br /> We checked numerous culverts during the inspection. <br /> culvert Problems on the Disney Creek road observed two <br /> read near the Suety refuse <br /> disposal area. <br /> We observed that the upper culvert , installed just <br /> below a swl tchbac�:: <br /> crushed o • was plugged on the upstream end and was <br /> n the downstream end at the _rest ��t the road partially <br /> operator replaced the culvert and assoc -ad C�Llt51!, <br /> the inspection. associated ated fill pe' the <br /> The second culvert , prior to the end of <br /> culvert �n the same road located below the switchback <br /> The silting of the dischargependi�flthelc`ulveert wa on s at <br /> end. <br /> in Part by a tree fall . The least caused <br /> Silt from the c -perator removed the fallen tree and <br /> culvert prior to the end of the inspection. <br /> WeWe Observed another <br /> Ob a area above Pluggsedimed culvert at the toe of the Suety refuse <br /> draining the t Pond U21 . We observed that a culvert <br /> This culvert was a the refuse pile through the road was plugged. <br /> the failure occurred. <br /> plugged during 1986 when the refuse pile <br /> erred. The operator attempted to clean the culvert <br /> during the inspection but was not able to complete the task because <br /> Of the extent Of plugging. �rf1erefore.issued NOV r:-B7-��, the Division representative <br /> �6. At sediment pond U21 we observed a delta of <br /> sediment can an inflow to the pond immediately acre, <br /> Spillway. The initial cc,nc ss from the <br /> was not been ern was that short-circuiting of the pond <br /> g prevented. The operators representative indicated that <br /> the inflow provided road drainage relief. <br /> at Section 4. 05.6 require that short-circuiting The Colorado regulations <br /> extent possible. In that regard the concern over <br /> be prevented to the <br /> with respect to road drainage was addressed. ever However, <br /> i circuiting <br /> apparent that as a result c, However, it was <br /> f the plugged culvert at the refuse toe <br /> that drainage from the disposal area was entering the pond at the <br /> same inflow as the road drainage. Therefore, the Division <br /> representative included removal of fkM ,- 14 ___ , . - <br />