Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes, June 26 - 27, 1991 2 <br /> d) Legislation. . . 1 ) HB 1115--has not yet been signed by the <br /> Governor; 2) SB 177--passed and, at the Department's request <br /> (ATTACHMENT A) , has been signed by the Governor; <br /> e) Amendments to SB 177 relating to the issue of delegation of <br /> authority, i .e. , to approve non-controversial 112 permits, to <br /> issue cessation orders to illegal operators and to issue reason to <br /> believe letters. Mr. Frank Johnson suggested the Board <br /> re-promulgate Rule 2.3 through emergency rule-making; and <br /> f) May 1991 Board Meeting Agenda. <br /> Staff Presentation by Steve Renner: <br /> 3. FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING <br /> MID-CONTINENT RESOURCES, INCORPORATED File No. C-81-017 <br /> 201 Centennial Street, Suite 406 <br /> Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 <br /> All persons wishing to give testimony were sworn. <br /> Secs. 28 and 31-34, T9S, R89W; Secs. 4-11 , 14-15, 16-25, 28-31 and <br /> 34-36, T10S, R89W; Secs. 1-2, 11-14 and 23-25, TIOS, R90W; Secs. 20 and <br /> 31 , T10S, R88W; Sec. 36, 179S, R90W; Sec. 6, T11S, R88W, Pitkin, <br /> Garfield and Gunnison Counties, 11 ,384 acres; underground coal . Board <br /> decision on Order issued by the Division to SHOW CAUSE WHY PERMIT <br /> SHOULD NOT BE SUSPENDED OR REVOKED (continued from the April 1991 Board <br /> Meeting) . <br /> Board Member Catherine Kraeger-Rovey addressed- the- Board and- recused <br /> herself from hearing this matter, in order to avoid an appearance of a <br /> conflict of interest. <br /> Mr. Frank Johnson, Assistant Attorney General , stated that the Division <br /> and the operator had reached a Settlement Agreement (EXHIBIT A). He <br /> said the Division feels the Settlement Agreement specs' 'es an <br /> appropriate corrective action for the alleged pattern of violations <br /> caused by the operator's failure to comply. Mr. Johnson suggested that <br /> instead of proceeding with the evidentiary hearing, the Board consider <br /> whether the Settlement Agreement would be an appropriate remedy, if it <br /> was found that a pattern of violations exists. If the Board determined <br /> that the Settlement Agreement would be an appropriate remedy, Mr. <br /> Johnson asked the Board to issue an Order, incorporating the terms of <br /> the Settlement Agreement and directing the operator to pursue that <br /> corrective action. <br /> At the Board's request, Mr. Johnson discussed the issue of two parties <br /> being excluded as signatories on the Settlement Agreement. He said the <br /> Settlement Agreement, if accepted, would allow the other parties to <br /> address specific concerns with the corrective actions set out in the <br /> Agreement. This issue was discussed in some detail . Mr. Maury Knizer, <br /> counsel to the Board, as well as Mr. Luke Danielson, Pre-hearing <br /> Conference Officer, recommended that the Board hear brief testimony <br /> from all parties to this hearing. The Board accepted that <br /> recommendation. <br />