1992-08-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017

• Permit No: C1981017
• IBM Index Class Name: GENERAL DOCUMENTS
• Doc Date: 8/26/1992
• Doc Name: Bid Documents ‎(IMP)‎ ‎(1 of 2)‎
• Permit Index Doc Type: General Correspondence
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Minutes, February 26-27, 1992 31
In response to a question from the Board, Staff stated that the
Division did follow correct legal procedure in this matter.
Staff said that in conversations with Mr. McKennis , he related 2
concerns : that the Division' s data processing form, which comes with
the application, was not made a part of the submittal that was filed
with the Garfield County Courthouse, and, therefore, Mr. McKennis feels
the application was incomplete; and Mr. McKennis feels that copies of
any correspondence generated by the Division during the review process
should also be filed at the Courthouse by the operator. Staff said
this has never been a requirement of the Division.
Staff referenced Exhibit A, and discussed the section about regulatory
requirements which relates to the submittal of a complete application.
Staff said all correspondence would not fall under those regulations .
However, any response submitted by the operator which would modify or
revise a permit application would need to be placed on file at the
Courthouse, as well - as the Division, because it becomes a binding part*
of the permit. Staff stated that this revision involved the submittal
of approximately 10 replaceme.nt pages and revised maps , and those
submittals have been filed appropriately, along with the cover letters .
Mr. Peter Matthies, with NCIG, stated that this revision entailed
correcting the permit outline to exclude a 40-acre tract of land that
was not owned by the lessor of the land included in the operator' s
permit. He assured the Board that all submittals have been
appropriately filed with the County Courthouse. However, he stated
that there has been a problem with documents disappearing, after
filings.
It was MOVED that the Board affirm the Division' s decision in this
matter. SECONDED AND PASSED 4 for (Danielson, Cooley, Stewart and
Danni ) ; 1 recused (Kraeger-Rovey) ; Cattany not present for the vote.
Staff Presentation by Dan Mathews:
22. FORMAL PUBLIC HEARING
MID-CONTINENT RESOURCES INCORPORATED File No. C-81-017
P. Q. Box 12.98
Glenwood Springs , CO 81602
All persons wishing to give testimony were sworn.
Mine Site located in Secs . 31 and 32, T9S, R89W; Secs . 5-8, 10-12 ,
14-21 and 28-30, TIOS, R89W; Sec. 36, T9S, R90W; Secs . 1 , 2, 11-14 and
23-25, T10S, R90W; Sec. 36, T9S, R90W, all in 6th P.M. , Pitkin and
Gunnison Counties . Rail loadout located in SE 1 /4 Sec . 35, T7S, R88W,
6th P.M. , Garfield County, 11 ,386 acres ; underground coal . Board
decision regarding Order to Show Cause why permit should not be
suspended or revoked.
Staff noted that this is a continuation of a hearing that began in May
of 1991 and heard again at the January 1992 Board Meeting.