1992-08-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017

• Permit No: C1981017
• IBM Index Class Name: GENERAL DOCUMENTS
• Doc Date: 8/26/1992
• Doc Name: Bid Documents ‎(IMP)‎ ‎(1 of 2)‎
• Permit Index Doc Type: General Correspondence
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

Minutes, August 26-27, 1992 17
General , said all of the issues regarding the rock dust plant have not
been resolved. However, he said that the Division has a certificate of
insurance for the rock dust plant which indicates that it is properly
insured. At the Board' s request, Mr. Holden said the operator would
stipulate that no equipment would be removed from the rock dust plant,
until a complete inventory has been completed.
Mr. Holden said he has conducted lien searches , but has not had an
opportunity to review the information collected. However, he said he
should be able to determine whether the Division has a perfected lien
on the contents of the rock dust plant through review of the
information he has collected. Mr. Holden said the operator will be
pursuing the possibility of including other property with the rock dust
plant, in order to obtain additional funds for reclamation.
Ms. Delaney said the demolition company with whom the operator has
contracted, Machinery and Equipment Company, has a proposal for
marketing and selling structures , facilities and equipment which they
plan to present to the Board during the September 1992 . Board Meeting.
She discussed this matter briefly.
The Director explained that the Division prefers a resolution to this
matter that would include selling the rock dust plant with the Division
refraining from taking possession of the property, in order to avoid
the liabilities that could be incurred.
Mr. Frank Johnson discussed the reclamation schedule outlined in the
original Settlement Agreement and requested that it be adopted by the
Board. However, he said negotiations between the Division and the
operator would continue, regarding the reclamation schedule and plan.
It was MOVED that the Board take the action of permit revocation and
endorse the proposed reclamation schedule on Page 5 of the Settlement
Agreement, with modifications to be resolved between the Division and
the operator, and allow operations to continue, regarding necessary
site reclamation and salvage of equipment and structures . SECONDED AND
PASSED 6 for (Cooley, Jouflas, Stewart, Danielson, Danni and McCannon) ;
1 abstained (Kraeger-Rovey) .