My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-11-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-11-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 5:42:25 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 10:58:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
11/15/1993
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Hydrology Correspondence Part (2 of 2)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s <br /> /QF C <br /> A � DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> David H.Getches,Executive Director <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br /> 1876 DAVID C.SHELTON, Director <br /> Richard D.Lamm <br /> Governor <br /> July 8, 1986 <br /> Mr. Doug Bowman <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. <br /> P.O. Box 158 <br /> Carbondale, Colorado 81623 <br /> Re: MLRD WATER SAMPLING, SPRING 1986, C-81 -017 <br /> Dear Mr. Bowman: <br /> Enclosed are the results of our sampling this Spring. Most interesting are <br /> the results of Well P-7. Sample (1 ) was filtered prior to acidification. <br /> Sample (2) was not filtered prior to acidification. The iron is highly <br /> elevated in Sample (2) as is aluminum and manganese. Most of the metals are <br /> somewhat higher in concentration in Sample (2). Obviously, the acid is <br /> leaching the metals and placing them in solution prior to lab filtering. In <br /> order to alleviate this problem, you should either filter on-site or place the <br /> sample in a non-acidified bottle and expedite delivery to the laboratory. The <br /> major chemical constituents of the water showed little variation between the <br /> samples as they are placed in non-acidified bottles. The variation in time to <br /> filtering produced no significant variation. <br /> Barium is elevated in all the samples, but highest in the lower ponds (001 ) <br /> and No. 1 mine discharge (004). Interestingly, P-7, the lower old refuse well <br /> has the lowest barium level . The barium levels are not above the stream <br /> standards in any of the samples. <br /> The SAR and associated sodium levels are very high in the No. 1 mine <br /> discharge. Sulfate is lower than expected from coal seams. Dutch Creek does <br /> not appear affected by the high sodium discharge. Iron is elevated in all the <br /> surface waters, but low in mine affected discharges. <br /> The water discharging from the Sutey Rock Drain is of relatively good quality <br /> and typified as calcium bicarbonate type. Again, sulfate is lower than <br /> expected from coal refuse affected areas. The low residence time of leachate <br /> in the pile and high recharge from spring run-off probably improve the quality <br /> of the water. <br /> 423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.