Laserfiche WebLink
authority. <br /> g. Whether or not the "pattern of violations" standard <br /> contained in §34-32-123(7) , C.R.S (1984) and Rule 5. 03 . 3 is <br /> unconstitutionally vague. <br /> h. The appropriate relief, if any, to be granted by <br /> the Board and the basis upon which such relief is proper . <br /> PROCEDURES <br /> 5 . a. Division presentation: The Division shall have 75 <br /> minutes in which to make its presentation to the Board: <br /> b. Presentations by intervening parties: The CVEPA, <br /> and the GCA (collectively referred to herein as "the intervening <br /> parties" ) shall have 30 minutes collectively in which to make <br /> their presentations. <br /> C. Mid-Continent ' s presentation: Mid-Continent shall <br /> have 105 minutes in which to make its presentation to the Board. <br /> d. Rebuttal and closing arguments by the intervening <br /> parties: The intervening parties, collectively, shall have 25 <br /> minutes in which to present any rebuttal evidence and to make <br /> their closing arguments. <br /> e. Division rebuttal and closing argument : The Divi- <br /> sion shall have 20 minutes in which to present any rebuttal evi- <br /> dence and to make its closing argument. <br /> f. Mid-Continent ' s closing argument : Mid-Continent <br /> shall have 45 minutes for surrebuttal and in which to make its <br /> closing argument. <br /> 6 . The prehearing conference officer remains convinced <br /> that full justice to the positions of all parties can be done <br /> without such an extensive commitment of time. The parties are <br /> therefore urged to be brief and to the point. The Board is urged <br /> to address this question at the outset of the proceeding. <br /> U E J. DANIELSON <br /> Prehearing conference officer <br /> Mined Land Reclamation Board <br /> AG File No. E9116915.104 <br />