My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1993-11-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
1993-11-15_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981017 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2021 5:40:25 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 9:00:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
11/15/1993
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) Hydrology Correspondence Part (1 of 2)
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br /> THE CRYSTAL RIVER DRAINAGE STUDY �� —�� <br /> August 1578 to May 1979 �Ir�IF- <br /> �� <br /> I! <br /> Introduction �Um S 1989 <br /> MCG7 - :):Lfll-SEHvic_.Fc <br /> A water quality investigation of the Crystal River drainaah MO 170RING SECtom <br /> GRAND JUNCTION <br /> was undertaken in the summer of 1978. Of primary concern were <br /> the detrimental effects by the Mid-Continent Coal Company (now <br /> Mid-Continent Resources, Inc. ) and the Anschultz Coal Company <br /> (now Snowmass Coal Company) to tributaries of the Crystal <br /> River. The secondary purpose was to establish referral data <br /> an this drainage for future monitoring or enforcement and locate <br /> any deleterious situations which would require a more in depth <br /> study. <br /> Summary and Conclusions <br /> 1 . The Crystal River between the town of Crystal and <br /> Redstone is a clean cold water fishery receiving no point <br /> source discharges. <br /> 2. The Redstone wastewater effluent flow was SbM ow or <br /> non-existent that no impk't4as recognizable in the Crystal <br /> River. , <br /> 3. The entire Crystal River exhibited excellent water <br /> quality except for a few elevated heavy metals concentrations <br /> at stations CR-8 and CR-9. <br /> 4. The Crystal River Fish Hatchery effluent did not pose <br /> a waste loading problem to the Crystal River. <br /> 5. Stations CR-9 and CR-10 had high fecal coliform and <br /> fecal streptococcus counts probably due to cattle grazing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.