My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_ENFORCEMENT - C1981017 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Coal
>
C1981017
>
_ENFORCEMENT - C1981017 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2020 1:11:00 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 8:23:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981017
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
Bid Documents (IMP) CV-91-023
Violation No.
C-91-023
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 3 - <br /> inside. :f current use is light use, but future use is for access <br /> or coal haulage, unneeded width should be ripped and seeded. <br /> In either case , appropriate drainage control structures should be <br /> installed and maintained. In road segments where road ditches <br /> cannot be maintained, a combination of waterbars and outside berms <br /> may be aporooriate , but the maintenance plan would need to address <br /> how snow removal would be accomplished without ousning berm <br /> material over the outslcpe. <br /> On some light use road segments where surface rill erosion is a <br /> problem, waterbars or beltline surface water deflectors which would <br /> intercept road surface drainage , but not ditch drainage may be <br /> appropriate. <br /> Consideration should be given to replacing culverts which are <br /> subject to frequent clogging or abrasion with appropriately <br /> designed and outfall protected dips or low water crossings . <br /> Given the high maintenance nature of the Coal Basin road system, a <br /> specific commitment of time and resources to regular and post storm <br /> event inspection and maintenance is critical . Plans for snow <br /> removal which are practical , yet compatible with the goal of <br /> minimizing sedimentation from the road system should be developed. <br /> Locations for storage or disposal and stabilization of sediment <br /> from ditch or sediment trap cleanout need to be specified. <br /> W th reswect to road width reduction, in most cases it should be <br /> accomplished by a combination of fill slope crest reduction and <br /> moving the drainage ditch further out from the cut slope . An <br /> exception would be upper segments of Road G which are characterized <br /> by well vegetated cut and fill slopes and which have experienced <br /> very little erosion. In such areas , the fill slope should not be <br /> disturbed . <br /> Problem: Excessive sedimentation to streams from road surfaces and drainage <br /> ditches ( see NOV C-91-017) <br /> Contributing Factors : <br /> Excessive ditch gradients , erosive velocities <br /> - Culverts or ditch relief drains which divert large volumes of <br /> sediment laden runoff directly into eater courses or onto steep, <br /> non vegetated slooes with little or no potential for any setting of <br /> sediment before the runoff reaches a live water course . <br /> Possible approaches : <br /> Riprap erosive ditch segments and/or install check structures to <br /> slow velocities . <br /> Provide additional ditch relief structures (culverts , waterbars , <br /> rolling dips) in locations where vegetation will provide some <br /> filtering of sediment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.