Laserfiche WebLink
JUSTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FOR <br /> NOV C-90-051 <br /> NOV C-90-051 was written for "failure to maintain diversions so as to minimize <br /> disturbance to the hydrologic balance." Mr. Routten cited two locations where <br /> ditches were eroded and downcutting had occurred. One was the east ditch on <br /> the Sutey refuse pile, the other was the ditch heading to Pond 5-1 . <br /> Ms. Delaney explained that both ditches drain into a sediment pond. There was <br /> no off-site damage. The Sutey Refuse Pile ditch has been repaired. <br /> The proposed civil penalty was: <br /> History $ 250.00 <br /> Seriousness 250.00 <br /> Fault 500.00 <br /> Good Faith 0.00 <br /> TOTAL 1000.00 <br /> History <br /> Five NOV's have been issued during the past twelve months. <br /> Seriousness <br /> I agree with the proposed penalty. <br /> Fau 1 t <br /> I agree with the proposed penalty. <br /> Good Faith <br /> The NOV has not been fully abated. Therefore, a good faith reduction is not <br /> proposed. <br /> Final Civil Penalty <br /> History $ 250.00 <br /> Seriousness 250.00 <br /> Fault 500.00 <br /> Good Faith 0.00 <br /> TOTAL 1000.00 <br /> /ddh <br /> 2704F <br />