Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dan Mathews 2 <br /> this regulation. The three parts of this regulation are: (1) Prevent, <br /> to the extent possible, additional contributions of sediment to <br /> streamflow or to runoff outside the permit area; (2) meet the more <br /> stringent of applicable State or Federal effluent limitations; and (3) <br /> minimize erosion to the extent possible. Compliance with any one of <br /> these parts does not mean that the operation is in compliance with the <br /> regulation in its entirety. AFO interprets MLRD's response to state <br /> that MLRD's permit only requires the operation to be in compliance with <br /> the effluent limitations part of this regulation. Because MLRD's <br /> response indicates that the permit does not address the other <br /> requirements of this regulation, AFO deems this to be a permit defect. <br /> Within 10 days after receipt of this letter, please submit to AFO <br /> adequate documentation that MLRD is requiring the operator to revise the <br /> permit to incorporate designs and specifications that address the other <br /> standards of the cited regulation: Additional contributions of sediment <br /> and minimization of erosion. The requirements imposed upon the operator <br /> must be in compliance with the form and timeframes established by INE-35. <br /> At the time of issuance, the TDN format was the appropriate format to <br /> use in identifying these violations to MLRD because one of the <br /> violations was identified as a performance standard violation. However, <br /> because both of these violations are now considered permit defects , <br /> further tracking of this issue and documentation for oversight reasons <br /> will follow the Ten-Day Letter concept. <br /> If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephen <br /> Rathbun at (505) 766-1486. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> i ; <br /> Robert H,/ Hagen, Director <br /> AlbuqueXqu� Field Office <br /> i` � <br />