Laserfiche WebLink
cc/��. . JOB NO 4 654 84 DATE 8-SU-84 <br /> TO Mid ( inent Resources, Inc. ehen an' -issoelateS, inc. DAILY REPORT NO 4 SHEET_ _OF 2 <br /> P.O. Box 158 CONSULTING utOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS <br /> SUBJECT FILL OBSERVATION 8 TESTING <br /> 01 5080Ad 154 HoldingPond No. 2 Mine Mid <br /> Carbondale, CO 81623 SOKA FOUNDATION Glenwood Springs.CO81601 <br /> Attn: Tom Johansen ENGINEERING Continent Resources near Redstone <br /> BG=Below Grade <br /> LABORATORY FIELD <br /> TES DEPTH <br /> TEST <br /> LOCATION T OR MAXIMUM DRY MOISTURE COMPAC- SOIL TYPE <br /> NO TYPE ELEVATION DRY oMc DENSITY CONTENT TION <br /> 7y Z MlV,5 (feet) DENSITY (%) (Pcf) (%) (°�) <br /> (PCO <br /> 5A 10' N. of S. end of pond #1 embankment, N 15' BG 118.6 13.0 112.5 13.3 95 Sandy clay $ gravel <br /> 10' E. of centerline <br /> SPECIFICATION COMPACTION & MATERIAL 95% standard Proctor density ❑ In our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as Indicated by <br /> test no.(s) <br /> ❑ In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as Indicated by <br /> Type and number of earth moving units test no(s) and should be removed or reworked <br /> Type and number of compaction units ❑ FIII tested meets specifications <br /> Number of passes thickness of lift ❑ Contractor advised <br /> ❑ Full time observation ❑ Part time observation <br /> Method of adding moisture <br /> PROGRESS REPORT <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of fill placement We have relied <br /> on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill <br /> during times when our observer is not observing operations Tests are made of the fill only as <br /> believed necessary to calibrate our observers judgement Test data are not the sole basis for <br /> opinions on whether the fill meets specifications <br /> eFrank Quinn Hans Froeschle <br /> HU OBSERVER APPROVED BY <br />