Laserfiche WebLink
NO 4 293 84 pA1 8-31-84 <br /> JOB <br /> TO <br /> IohnSon COnstrLiCtlon then anu associates, inc. DAILY REPORT NO 15 SHEET 1 OF 1 <br /> 89<_, Ashley Road � CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS SUBJECT FILL OBSERVATION & TESTING <br /> 5080 Rd 154 <br /> Craig, CO 81625 SOIL&1`00NDATN)N Glenwood Springs Co 81601 Mid Continent Embankment Compact ion <br /> Attn: Rudd Rolver (NGINEtIIING Testing <br /> LABORATORY FIELD <br /> DEPTM <br /> TEST TEST OR MAXIMUM DRY MOISTURE COMPAC- SOIL TYPE <br /> NO LOCATION <br /> TYPE ELEVATION DRY OMC DENSITY CONTENT TION <br /> 11w1) DENSITY I%) (Pcf) 1%) 1+1 <br /> fpcf) <br /> 5fi 100' N. of S. end of embankment #S, N Final 18.2 ll .5 116.6 8.5 99 Sandy clay & gravel <br /> 5' F. of centerline Grade <br /> 5O' N. of S. end of embankment 45 Final <br /> 5i S' IV. of centerline N Grade 118.2 11 .5 114. 7 12.3 97 " <br /> 8 15' N. of S. end of embankment a#5, N Final 118.2 11 .5 114.7 9.9 97 " <br /> at centerline Grade <br /> 30' l4. of F. cnd of embankment #4 Final <br /> '� at centerline N Grade 18.2 11 .5 113. 1 9.5 96 " <br /> '5 ' N. of S. encl of cmbanknicnt if4, Final „ <br /> c,0 N <br /> :, ' IV. of ccnterl ine Grade 18.2 11 .5 114.3 12.3 97 <br /> r>1 80' \. of S. cnd of embankment lt4 Final <br /> 5' 12. of centerline N Grade 18.2 11 .5 114.7 13.4 97 " <br /> 95`o SPECIFICATION COMPACTION 6 MATERIAL standard Proctor density O In our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as indicated by <br /> test no(s) <br /> O In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as indicated by <br /> Type and number of earth moving units <br /> Dozer test no(s) and should be removed or reworked <br /> Type and number of compaction units <br /> Vib. roller EX Fill tested meets specifications <br /> l 1 IX Contractor advised <br /> Number of passes thickness of lift <br /> Natural 0 Full time observation IQ Part time observation <br /> Method of adding moisture PROGRESS REPORT Pond #4 had 4' of fill placed on south <br /> side of embankment. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of fill placement We have relied <br /> on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill <br /> during times when our observer is not observing operations Tests are made of the fill only as <br /> believed necessary to calibrate our observer's judgement Test data are not the sole basis for <br /> opinions an-whether the fill meets specifications <br /> cc: Mid Continent Resources <br /> Frank Quinn Hans Froeschle <br /> OBSERVER APPROVED BY <br />