Laserfiche WebLink
rc i JOB NO 4 293 84 DATE 8-28-84 <br /> TO Johnso onstruction then ani ssociateS, inc. DAILY REPORT NO 12 SHEET 1 OF 1 <br /> 899 Ashley Road CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS SUBJECT FILL OBSERVATION d TESTING <br /> 5080 ri 5 <br /> S01[L(OUNDAT10N <br /> Craig , CO 81625 Glenwood SprinngsCO81601 Mid Continent Embankment Compaction <br /> At Budd Bower [NGIN([ NING Testing <br /> BG=Below Grade <br /> LABORATORY FIELD <br /> DEPTH <br /> TESNOT LOCATION TEST TYPE ELEVOATION DAY MAXIMUM DRY MOISTURE COMPAC- SOIL TYPE <br /> OMC DENSITY CONTENT TION <br /> (test) DENSITY 1%) (Pd) (4) <br /> (Pet) <br /> 9A 25' N. of S. end of embankment #4, N 10' BG 127.0 8.7 115.5 18.8 91 Clayey sandy grave <br /> of centerline <br /> ��� � 5' W. of centerline SS' N. of S. cnd of embankment 04, N 10' BG 27.0 8.7 115.3 17.3 91 " <br /> SPECIFICATION COMPACTION & MATERIAL 95% standard Proctor density ❑ In our opinion, fill generally meets specifications as Indicated by <br /> test no(s) <br /> 6 In our opinion, fill does not meet specifications as Indicated by <br /> Dozer test no(s) 49A, 50A and should be removed or reworked <br /> Type and number of earth moving units <br /> Type and number of compaction units Vib. roller ❑ FIII tested meets specifications <br /> Number of passes thickness of Ilfl It IN Contractor advised <br /> Method of adding moisture <br /> Natural ❑ Full time observation )b Part time observation <br /> PROGRESS REPORT <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of fill placement We have relied <br /> on the contractor to continue applying the recommended compactive effort and moisture to the fill <br /> during times when our observer is not observing operations Tests are made of the fill only as <br /> believed necessary to calibrate our observer's judgement Test data are not the sole basis for <br /> opintons On whether the fill meets specifications <br /> cc: Mid Continent Resources <br /> Frank Quinn Hans Froeschle <br /> OBSERVER APPROVED BY <br />