Laserfiche WebLink
PERMIT #: P- 2012 -006 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: MAC <br />INSPECTION DATE: September 6, 2012 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The inspection was conducted by Michael Cunningham of the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />(Division). Scott Hazlitt of Gold Hill Minerals and Bruce Humphries of Regulatory Permits Management were <br />present on behalf of the Operator. Also, Mike Johnson and Eric Schroder of the US Forest Service were present <br />for the inspection. The Gold Hill Minerals Bueno Mine and Mill Exploration site is located on the west side of <br />Jamestown, Colorado. The drilling operation is occurring on patented claims and unpatented claims on US <br />Forest Service land. <br />On September 5, 2012, the Division received notice from the Operator that there was a loss of containment of <br />drilling fluid at the site. The loss of containment of drilling fluid was discovered at approximately 11:OOam on <br />September 5, 2012. The drilling operations are taking place on top of a historic mine dump located near the <br />350 level portal entrance. According to the Operator, the depth to bedrock at the location of the drill pad is <br />approximately 50 ft. The drill casing did not extend to bedrock, but only went to a depth of 15 ft. below the <br />ground surface. The drilling fluid saturated the mine dump and was found to be discharging from the toe of <br />the mine dump located adjacent to the 450 level portal entrance. <br />From the toe of the mine dump, the discharge entered into a natural drainage basin and traveled down the <br />drainage basin for a distance of approximately 0.2 miles. The discharge terminated at a point where an old <br />road intersected the drainage basin. The drainage basin flows into Little James Creek; the discharge did not <br />reach the creek. Once it was determined that there was a loss of containment of drilling fluid, the Operator <br />shut down the drill and constructed a makeshift detention basin at the toe of the mine dump. The detention <br />basin was constructed of tarps and timber and helped to capture several gallons of drilling fluid. The Operator <br />followed the Division's spill reporting procedures as defined by Hard Rock Rule 3.1.13(1), which requires the <br />Operator to notify the Division and other agencies with jurisdiction over the spill within 24 hours. <br />The Operator estimated that approximately 1,440 gallons of drilling fluid was lost. This estimate was based on <br />four hours of drilling; the drill uses six gallons per minute. The drilling fluid consists of water, bentonite, fines <br />and Poly -Plus. Poly -Plus is a multi - functional synthetic co- polymer used as a viscosifier, shale inhibitor, <br />flocculant and lubricant in most water -based drilling fluids. The Material Safety Data Sheet for the product has <br />a HMIS Health rating of 1, which indicates the product only poses a slight risk to human health. It should be <br />noted that the HMIS rating applies to the concentrated form of Poly -Plus. According to the Operator, the Poly - <br />Plus, which is in a liquid form, was added at a rate of 1.5 gallons to approximately 1,500 gallons of water. The <br />Poly -Plus accounted for approximately 0.1% of the drilling fluid solution. <br />The Division traversed the entire length of the drainage basin, beginning at the toe of the mine dump. The <br />discharge from the mine dump had ceased by the time the Division arrived at the site. The temporary <br />detention basin was full of drilling fluid. The areas where drilling fluid came into contact with the ground <br />surface were evident by a white discoloration. There were small areas within the basin which contained pools <br />of the drilling fluid; however, most of the areas in between the pools were no longer moist. The residue of the <br />drilling fluids was, on average, 1/8" to 1/2" deep. <br />The Division and the USFS discussed possible cleanup methods which included shallow excavation of any areas <br />where the drilling fluid had pooled and was still moist and raking in the surface of areas where the drilling fluid <br />was dry. The Division feels this would be an appropriate way to handle the cleanup of the drilling fluid in the <br />drainage basin based on the amount of drilling fluid which was lost and the relatively benign nature of the <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />