My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-03-16_REPORT - C1981010 (12)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2007-03-16_REPORT - C1981010 (12)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:16:36 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 12:31:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/16/2007
Doc Name
2006 AHR Section 6.0 Observed Impacts
Annual Report Year
2006
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.0 OBSERVED IMPACTS ON THE HYDROLOGIC SYSTEMS <br />OF THE TRAPPER MINE <br />6.1 GROUND WATER <br />Water -level changes in the last few years for the QR aquifer are mainly due to natural <br />variations in the recharge rate. Water -level changes were observed in QR aquifer wells GD -2 and <br />GF -6, along with associated backfill wells GD -3 and GF -11. Water levels in wells GD -2 and GD -3 <br />declined in 2006 and these declines are thought to be due to some deep exploration drilling in this <br />area. Wells GD -2 and GF -6 are fairly close to mined areas but a slight increase in water levels were <br />observed in wells GF -6 and GF -11 in 2006 while a significant decline was observed in wells GD -2 <br />and GD -3. Additional monitoring with time is needed to determine the significance of the decline <br />in wells GD -2 and GD -3. The responses in wells GF -6 and GF -11 indicated that the present water <br />level gradually increased due to the increase in precipitation in 2005 and 2006. These wells are <br />located near the downgradient toe of D and E pits and/or at the interface of upgradient backfill and <br />the downgradient native QR aquifer. These well locations seem to be relating to changes in <br />precipitation with very little lag in time. <br />Upgradient mining can cause water -level rises in wells downgradient of the mining by <br />allowing ground water to flow to the downgradient end of mine quicker. The backfill aquifers are <br />generally more permeable than the native aquifer which also allows ground water to flow faster <br />through the backfill material resulting in more water in the aquifer at this location. The input of <br />additional water to the native aquifer at the north end (toe) of the mine has decreased the effects <br />mine dewatering has had on water levels in this portion of the aquifer. Water levels in wells GF -6 <br />and GF -11 are thought to be at or above the baseline levels for this reason. The slightly higher <br />water levels in well GD -2 in 1998 than those observed in 1986 after six wet years indicates the <br />Trapper Mining Company 6-1 <br />2006 Annual Report <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.