Laserfiche WebLink
2.5 2006 Hydrological Data <br />Hydro- Engineering Inc.'s collation of the 2006 hydrological data for Trapper Mine is submitted as Section <br />2.5, following this discussion, and addresses: <br />a. Groundwater Sections 2.0 -3.6 <br />(1) Groundwater level figures and tables Appendix A <br />(2) Groundwater quality figures and tables Appendix B <br />(3) Piezometric surface maps for the major aquifers Maps 2 -1 thru 2 -3 <br />(4) Springs data Appendix B <br />b. Surface water Sections 4.0 -5.3 <br />(1) Surface -water quality figures and tables Appendix C <br />(2) Flow measurement figures Appendix C <br />(3) Flow vs TSS vs time figures Appendix C <br />(4) Conductivity vs flow vs time figures Appendix C <br />c. Observed impacts on the hydrologic systems Section 6.0 <br />Included with the 2006 Hydrology Report is an index sheet to keep the basic well data and aquifer <br />information available to the reader. This index is to be used as the reference and also a "bookmark" as <br />the section is reviewed. <br />2.6 Trends <br />Hydro- Engineering's Section 6.0 discusses the observed impacts on the hydrologic systems of Trapper <br />Mine. Ten surface water monitoring sites experienced discharge during 2006. Peak flows occurred in <br />the late winter and spring in association with snowmelt runoff and unseasonably warm precipitation <br />events. Above average flows were also recorded during a 100 year storm event in mid September. <br />Hydro- Engineering's Section 6.0 discussion provides details concerning 2006 trends. Overall, Trapper <br />continues to have little effect on the local hydrologic regime as noted by OSM in their Phase III Bond <br />Release inspection narrative. <br />2.7 Spoil Spring Sampling (2006) <br />Trapper conducted spoil spring sampling throughout the permit area during 2006. Data from this <br />monitoring is presented in the 2006 Annual Hydrology Report Appendix B Table B -2. Spring and Seep <br />locations are shown on Map M52 in the mine permit. Only those springs with flows exceeding 5 gpm are <br />sampled for full suite analysis in accordance with the approved monitoring program. <br />2.8 WET Testing Results <br />In 2006, three NPDES outfalls had Acute WET tests performed as required by NPDES Permit CO- <br />0032115 - sites 011, 020 and 021. In all cases the discharges showed no acute toxicity to the test <br />species. Summaries for the tests conducted during 2006 are included in Appendix C of Section 2.5. In <br />accordance with our NPDES permit only those drainages that receive pit dewatering or spoil spring <br />contributions are required to undergo WET testing. <br />GCR 3/07 <br />M:IANNUALRPIDRMS06RPT ANNUALHYDROLOGYRPTS <br />