Laserfiche WebLink
64 <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />people had just read what Mariah and Tony Waldon and <br />Harry Ranney had stated, it would be site specific <br />on all expansion areas. <br />You must -- you must investigate that <br />property before you enter it. To get a negative <br />determination -- after you do a prime farmland <br />investigation, you must have a written document <br />requesting a negative decision based upon that prime <br />farmland investigation. And that had never been <br />done. No prime farmland investigation. <br />They did a soil survey; the one in <br />1996, as they were referring to, was for a <br />progressive soil. A soil survey was supposed to be <br />made if it contained a prime farmland soil, which <br />was the Barx, not the progressive. <br />So they did this 1996 survey with <br />Dean Stint, but it didn't mean anything. It was <br />progressive soil. It wasn't a prime soil at that <br />time. It wasn't even classified as a prime soil. <br />So from 1992 when Dean Stint entered <br />that property, he made -- it's a 220 -acre piece down <br />in a little southeast corner was this little tiny <br />piece of Barx, and he says, This is not prime soil <br />based on it has not sufficient irrigation. <br />But then they took that 1992 letter <br />