My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-09-19_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2012-09-19_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:08:17 PM
Creation date
9/19/2012 1:52:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/19/2012
Doc Name
PR-6 November 17, 2010 Hearing Transcript before the MLRB
From
Jeff Fugate - AGO
To
Sandy Brown, Marcia Talvitie, David Berry, John Roberts
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
MLT
SB1
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
37 <br />1 That was covered in a meeting in <br />2 February 15th of 2008 in Grand Junction with NRCS <br />3 and the division, and the NRCS provided immediate <br />4 guidance as to what topsoil stripping procedures <br />5 must be employed immediately to preserve the prime <br />6 farmland. <br />7 And also procedures were set up to <br />8 also look at the -- what we call the Bench 1 <br />9 suitable subsoil that was already placed on the <br />10 eastern portion of the Morgan property to make sure <br />11 that it met the standards of suitability, and those <br />12 suitability standards covered EC, pH, sodium <br />13 absorption, rock fragments. <br />14 All kinds of parameters were tested <br />15 to make sure that that eastern portion of the <br />16 suitable subsoil that was already placed on Morgan <br />17 met the standards that prime farmland required. <br />18 As time went on, we then submitted <br />19 all these procedures in TR 57, which Marcia also <br />20 mentioned. That was ultimately approved with no <br />21 protest. But the procedures were -- were initiated <br />22 on the ground immediately after that Grand Junction <br />23 meeting as soon as the prime farmland was announced <br />24 by NRCS. <br />25 And then as part of PR 6, we <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.