Laserfiche WebLink
Wells in these two bedrock aquifer systems, the upper and lower Piceance Basin aquifers, <br />typically range in depth from 500 to 2,000 feet and commonly produce between 2 to 500 <br />gallons per minute of water (USGS, 1984). These Tertiary bedrock aquifers are <br />stratigraphically separated from the base of the Cameo Coal Zone in the Cretaceous <br />Mesaverde Group by from less than 1,500 feet of strata along the Douglas Creek Arch to <br />more than 11,000 feet along the basin trough just west of the Grand Hogback (Johnson <br />and Nuccio, 1986) (Figure A3 -2). <br />Aquifer maps do not exist for the Piceance Basin, but water quality in the Piceance Basin <br />is poor owing to nahcolite (sodium bicarbonate) deposits and salt beds within the basin <br />(Graham, 2001). Only very shallow waters such as those from the surficial Green River <br />Formation are used for drinking water (Graham, CDWR, 2001). In general, the potable <br />water wells in the Piceance Basin extend no further than 200 feet in depth, based on well <br />records maintained by the Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDWR). At least two <br />wells in the area are approximately 1,000 feet in depth, but they are used for stock <br />watering. A composite water quality sample taken from 4,637 to 5,430 feet deep within <br />the Cameo Coal Group in the Williams Fork Formation exhibited a total dissolved solid <br />(TDS) level of 15,500 mg/L, which is above the 10,000 TDS water quality criterion for a <br />underground source of water (USDW) (Graham, CDWR, 2001). The produced water <br />from coalbed methane extraction in the Piceance Basin is of such low quality that it must <br />be disposed of in evaporation ponds or re- injected into the formation from which it came <br />or at even greater depths (Tessin, 2001). <br />It is unlikely that any USDWs and coals targeted for methane production would coincide <br />in this basin. These targeted coals are generally located at great depth, of at least 4,000 <br />feet. The thousands of feet of stratigraphic separation between the coal gas bearing <br />Cameo Zone and the lower aquifer system in the Green River Formation should prevent <br />any of the effects from the hydrofracturing of gas - bearing strata from reaching either the <br />upper or the lower bedrock aquifers. <br />Permeability of the coal and the surrounding sandstone and shale is generally quite low <br />except near outcrop, creating little potential for these rocks to contain a USDW. <br />Researchers (Reinecke et al., 1991) report that the permeability of gas - bearing coal and <br />sandstone of the Cameo Zone is so low that the gas is over - pressured and has forced <br />groundwater out of the zone, a condition that tends to disfavor the entrapment of <br />methane. Tyler et al. (1998) state that high coalbed methane gas productivity requires <br />geologic and hydrologic conditions, and that these conditions are not optimal throughout <br />much of the Piceance Basin because of the absence of dynamic groundwater flow and the <br />low permeability of the host rocks. <br />The above conditions prevail in the central part of the basin, previously favored as a <br />coalbed methane development fairway, and heavily targeted for exploration (Nowak, <br />1991). However, analyses by Tyler et al. (1998) suggest that a transitional zone, between <br />the deeply buried coal and the outcrops at the boundaries of the basin, where groundwater <br />Evaluation of Impacts to Underground Sources <br />of Drinking Water by Hydraulic Fracturing of <br />Coalbed Methane Reservoirs <br />June 2004 <br />A3 -4 <br />