My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-09-06_REVISION - M2008070 (23)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2008070
>
2012-09-06_REVISION - M2008070 (23)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:25:46 PM
Creation date
9/13/2012 12:42:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008070
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/6/2012
Doc Name
AM-01, DPHE REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SOLID WASTE SITES & FACILITIES
From
WESTERN GRAVEL
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />retained fees on NPL sites where such settlement monies have been <br />received, the jurisdiction must submit information on the settlement to <br />the Department, with an accounting of these monies to show that they <br />have been expended. <br />6. Only the costs of response activities at sites on the NPL where the <br />local jurisdiction is required to perform such activities as a <br />consequence of being a potentially responsible party (as defined by <br />the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and <br />Liability Act (CERCLA) and the National Contingency Plan) or as a <br />result of a Record of Decision, Order, Consent Decree, Consent <br />Agreement, or other agreement between the local jurisdiction and the <br />• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, qualify for retention and <br />expenditure of collected fees. Allowable expenses include, but are not <br />limited to: the costs of producing required documents such as <br />Remedial Investigations, Feasibility Studies, Records of Decision, and <br />Remedial Designs; the cost of constructing remedial or removal <br />actions; and legal costs associated with the negotiation of orders with <br />the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Allowable expenses do not <br />include, without limitation: certain litigation costs, including cost <br />recovery; costs incurred as a regulatory oversight agency that are not <br />required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; additional <br />actions taken at the discretion of the jurisdiction that are not required <br />by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and costs associated <br />with sites that are not on the NPL. <br />7. Upon approval from the Department, a jurisdiction may be credited <br />fees for future allowable expenses, if it can be shown that the <br />expenditure and remittance of fees as described above will not cover <br />the estimated allowable expenses. This need must be demonstrated <br />by showing projected allowable expenditures against expected <br />revenues from retained fees. The approval of the Department will be <br />based on compliance with § 25 -16- 104.5, C.R.S. and these regulations <br />regarding allowable expenses. In addition, the Department may <br />consider other factors such as the time period of retention, in <br />assessing such a request. <br />D. Audit: The Department may audit a facility in order to ascertain whether or not <br />the facility is in compliance with these regulations and the governing statute. <br />1. An operator of a solid waste disposal facility shall retain all records <br />regarding the collection and remittance of solid waste user fees for a <br />period of three years. <br />December 30, 2010 <br />• <br />39.5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.