My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-09-06_REVISION - M2008070 (25)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2008070
>
2012-09-06_REVISION - M2008070 (25)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:25:46 PM
Creation date
9/13/2012 12:29:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2008070
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/6/2012
Doc Name
AM-01 DESIGN & OPERATIONS PLAN, PROPOSED WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY
From
WESTERN GRAVEL
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Design and Operations Plan <br />Western Gravel E & P Waste Disposal Facility <br />2.3.2.6 Slope Stability <br />October 24, 2011 <br />Page 10 of 51 <br />excavation may be conducted in order to construct the cells. A dozer equipped with rippers will conduct <br />bedrock excavating activities. Blasting will not be conducted in order to excavate bedrock. <br />• Since the landfill will be constructed atop bedrock located along the terrace face, potential of significant <br />slope erosion appears low. <br />• The only floodplain relevant to the facility is the White River located along the north and east sides of <br />the site. The White River is located approxim ately 45 feet below the facility. Only ephemeral drainages <br />that flow to the White River floodplain are located along the north faces to the west and east of the <br />landfill area. <br />Because the north side of the landfill is locate d on a terrace above the White River, a potential geologic <br />hazard exists. Therefore, in addition to the geologic hazard assessment discussed in Section 2.3.2.5, a slope <br />stability evaluation was conducted. Slope stability evaluation results are discussed below. <br />Slope stability analyses were conducted using the proposed final waste and soil cover grades of 6 <br />(Horizontal) to 1 (Vertical). Stability of the materials used to construct the cells was evaluated three <br />different ways including the following. <br />• Stability of final cover soils in a saturated condition. <br />• Stability of waste materials placed without toe confinement provided by cell side slopes. <br />• Overall global stability of a waste cell under static conditions and constructed to final design <br />configurations including adjacent terrace slope. <br />• Overall global stability of a waste cell under dynamic conditions (seismic coefficient of 0.128) and <br />constructed to final design configurations including adjacent terrace slope. <br />Stability of recommended final cover s oils was analyzed using an infinite slope stability model under both <br />static and dynamic (seismic) conditions. The proposed cell waste slope and overall global stability were <br />analyzed using the "Simplified Bishop" and "Mohr - Columb" methods in order to determine the factor of <br />safety against failure. Material strengths were estimated based upon available data associated with WG or <br />other projects that accept similar waste and are constructed in areas that exhibit similar soil and bedrock <br />materials properties. In accordance with industry standards, the required minimum factor of safety used for <br />this project is 1.5 under static conditions and 1.2 under dynamic conditions . <br />The calculated factor safety of fmal soil cover materials failing over the waste is 4.3 a nd the calculated factor <br />of safety of failure within waste materials is 1.83. The factor of safety associated with a large scale global <br />slope failure occurring within the completed cell and through the adjacent terrace slope is 4.32 under static <br />conditions and 2.41 under dynamic conditions. Stability analyses conducted under dynamic conditions and <br />with a failure through the underlying bedrock surface exhibited a factor of safety of 2.62. Based upon the <br />above calculated factors of safety, the proposed design and assumed materials properties suggest that the <br />facility will be stable from failures associated with final soil cover, above grade waste materials, and from a <br />large scale failure occurring at the facility under both static and dynamic (seismic) cond itions. A more <br />detailed discussion of the stability analyses methods, specific soil parameters, calculations, and data are <br />provided in Appendix B. <br />NWCC, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.