My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-03-17_REPORT - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1989-03-17_REPORT - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2021 3:58:11 PM
Creation date
9/10/2012 6:52:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/17/1989
Doc Name
Clarifications
From
San Juan County Mining Venture
To
MLRD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Larry Petrino <br /> August 15, 1988 <br /> Page Two <br /> • Gravity loaded with ANFO column 8 ft high. <br /> • Top 3 ft, no explosive and no stemming. <br /> • Detonation by NONEL with 0 to 15 ms delays. <br /> • Bottom primed. <br /> • Area blasted in single shot up to 15 ft wide by 200 ft long. <br /> Based upon the blasting specifications, we calculate a current powder factor of 2.7 lbs <br /> ANFO per cubic yard or 1.31 lbs ANFO per short ton. Powder factor varies depending upon the <br /> rock type, rock structure, and hole pattern, however, it appears to be high based upon open pit <br /> practice. An empirical relationship between powder factor, fracture frequency, and joint shear <br /> strength is attached as Figure 1.0, and may provide some general guidance. Your application is <br /> probably in the 0 to 2 fractures/foot range, with friction angles of 35 to 40 degrees. Note that the <br /> curves are very steep in this range; however, discussions with some of our other clients suggest <br /> that your powder factor should be in the range of 0.75 to 1.0 lbs per ton. <br /> The burden and spacing of the holes is small for open pit blasting, however, it is necessary <br /> to prevent cratering of the shallow holes. You may be able to reduce the hole charge, and <br /> thereby, reduce the blast damage sustained at the final wall. Changing this parameter will <br /> require some experimentation by your site personnel who have experience. <br /> Delays Between Holes and Rows <br /> Recent work has shown that increasing the delays between holes and rows will reduce the <br /> damage induced on the final wall. Blast damage is strongly correlated with the peak particle <br /> velocity generated by the blast. The initial pressure wave associated with detonation of the <br /> primer has the greatest impact on peak particle velocity. This effect is illustrated by Figure 2.0, <br /> which shows particle velocity as a function of distance from the blast and quantity of explosive <br /> detonated per delay. Based upon my conversation with Mike Fouts, your largest-scale blast (15 <br /> ft by 200 ft) could involve a last row of 33 holes with roughly 900 lbs of ANFO detonated by the <br /> last delay. Using Figure 2.0, this would be sufficient to cause the breakage of rock (particle <br /> velocities of 100 in./sec) a distance of 43 ft from the last row of holes. <br /> The size of the charge per delay can be reduced by using delays between holes on each <br /> row and delays between rows. I've attached a copy of USBM RI 9008, which describes the <br /> results of recent work to improve highwall stability in open cut coal mining. This work used 17 <br /> ms delays between holes and 100 to 150 ms delays between rows. The net effect is to reduce the <br /> instantaneous charge per delay to a single hole and to assure that the burden of the previous row <br /> is removed from the current holes. <br /> Stability is also enhanced when the direction of burden movement is perpendicular to the <br /> final pit wall. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.