My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-08-30_HYDROLOGY - C2009087 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Coal
>
C2009087
>
2012-08-30_HYDROLOGY - C2009087 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:07:12 PM
Creation date
8/31/2012 10:17:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2009087
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
8/30/2012
Doc Name
2nd Quarter 2012 DMRS (CO-0048275)
From
Pebody Sage Creek Mining, LLC
To
WQCD
Permit Index Doc Type
DMR’s
Email Name
JDM
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peabod <br />1111 ENERGY <br />Peabody Sage Creek Mining, LLC <br />Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment <br />Water Quality Control Division <br />Permits and Enforcement Section <br />4300 Cherry Creek Drive South <br />Denver, CO 80246 -1530 <br />Dear Sir or Madam: <br />July 25, 2012 <br />36600 Routt County Rd. 27 <br />PO Box 250 <br />Hayden, CO. 81639 <br />(970) 276-7001 <br />RECEIVED <br />AUG 3 0 2012 <br />Division of Reclamation <br />Mining & Safety <br />RE: Quarterly DMRs for CPDS Permit No. CO- 0048275, Peabody Sage Creek Mine <br />Pursuant to the quarterly reporting requirements contained in Colorado Discharge Permit <br />CO- 0048275 for the Peabody Sage Creek Mine, enclosed find the second quarter 2012 <br />discharge monitoring reports for Outfalls 002 to 004. <br />Two excursions of effluent limits occurred this quarter, both of which involved the <br />selenium standard, 4.6 ug /1. The Outfall 002 potentially dissolved selenium value was 4.7 <br />ug /1 on a sample collected June 6. This value was obtained by ICP -MS, EPA Method <br />M200.8. However, one other selenium test method was performed on this sample, as we <br />are investigating the differences in the methods. The total recoverable selenium value <br />was 3.4 ug /1 on the same sample; this value was obtained by ICP -MS, EPA Method <br />M200.8. As one would expect the total recoverable method to result in the same, or <br />higher, value than the potentially dissolved method (the former involves a hot acid <br />digestion, while the later involves a cold acid digestion), we suspect that the 4.7 ug /1 <br />value to be in error. This may be due to matrix interference in the sample that displays <br />itself in the potentially dissolved ICP -MS method. We have noticed this phenomenon in <br />previous DMRs. The lab report for this sample is attached to this cover letter. Note that <br />the lab report gives selenium values in mg /1, not ug /1. <br />The Outfall 004 potentially dissolved selenium value was 5.7 ug /1 on a sample collected <br />June 11. This value was obtained by ICP -MS, EPA Method M200.8. One other selenium <br />test methods was performed on this sample also. The total recoverable selenium value <br />was 1.3 ug /1 on the same sample; this value was obtained by ICP -MS, EPA Method <br />M200.8. As one would expect the total recoverable method to result in the same, or <br />higher, value than the potentially dissolved method (the former involves a hot acid <br />digestion, while the later involves a cold acid digestion), we suspect that the 5.7 ug/1 <br />value to be in error. This may be due to matrix interference in the sample that displays <br />itself in the potentially dissolved ICP -MS method. The lab report for this sample is <br />attached to this cover letter. Note that this lab report gives selenium values in ug /1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.