My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-08-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2012-08-10_PERMIT FILE - C1981018A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2017 10:47:27 AM
Creation date
8/29/2012 12:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/10/2012
Section_Exhibit Name
SECTION II.E & II.F Climatology Report & Vegetaton Studies
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ERO Resources <br /> 11 the potential of sagebrush lands hae bean drastically altered, <br />• perhaps permanently; <br /> 2) important events in cyclic trends in pristine sagebrush/ <br /> grasslands have been truncated by land use since the 1850's and <br /> more inQortantly that some of these events such as wildfire, now <br /> produce results that produce further degradation affects Isee <br /> also, Young and Evans 19781 due to the prevalence of cheatgrass <br /> on degraded range; <br /> 3> degradation of sagebrush rangelands continues in the present day <br /> as both the result of established downward trends and as the <br /> result of inadequate range management practices; and <br /> 4) the probability of restoring sagebrush lands to pristine or near <br /> pristine conditions is slight, at best, primarily because <br /> sagebrush/grasslands were never true grasslands -this feature <br /> relates to two important sub-concepts 111 that the perennial <br /> grass component will not be rejuvenated by grazing precsure <br /> relaxation alone: reintroduction of perennial grasses by seeding <br /> is also necessary and 121 that the relative youth of the <br />• sagebrush and pinyon-juniper ecosystems is a factor in their <br /> notably cyclic and instable character: evolution of process and <br /> species dynamics in these 6ystB1116 was incompletely developed by <br /> the time dortwstic grazing animals were introduced. <br />Dwyer 119751 has reviewed much of this and similar information that <br />indicate a general increase in the predominance of woodlands resulting <br />from increased land use pressures. Sheep grazing is of particular <br />interest in Dwyer 's review. References cited by Dwyer include Miller <br />119Z1), Emerson 119321, Allred (19491, Johnsen 119611 and Jameson (]966 <br />and 19701. Johnsen advances four suggestions concerning the increase of <br />juniper in southwestern rangelands: <br />1) lack of periodic fires that control the numbers of young juniper <br />trees; <br />2) increased spread of juniper seed by livestock, particularly <br />sheep; <br />II.F-13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.