My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-08-21_REVISION - M1980244 (32)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2012-08-21_REVISION - M1980244 (32)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:05:39 PM
Creation date
8/27/2012 11:12:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/21/2012
Doc Name
APPLICATION RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM10
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50. Page 114, LVSC system monitoring — Given the requirement to maintain less than two feet of head on the <br />low volume solution collection (LVSC) liner and the pumping rates observed in the AGVLF LVSC sumps, <br />the Division requests the Applicant commit to monitoring water levels in the SGVLF at least daily, as is <br />current practice in the AGVLF. <br />RESPONSE. Prior amendment applications reviewed and approved for the Cresson Project presented at <br />least weekly monitoring of the AGVLF. CC &V is committed to conducting undocumented daily monitoring on <br />the approved AGVLF and proposed SGVLF by process operations and at least weekly documented <br />monitoring of the approved AGVLF and proposed SGVLF by professional Environmental Resources Staff, as <br />is the current practice at CC& V. <br />51. Paize 12 -10, section 12.4.2 — The Applicant cites changing conditions and project economics for reasons to <br />vary the amount of backfilling in the mine pits. The Division understands the difficulty in committing to such <br />a large undertaking. However, safety, water quality and aesthetics are important considerations to be <br />considered in the reclamation phase of the Cresson Project. Furthermore, economics should not be a major <br />reason for reducing the planned backfill during reclamation. In order to prevent major disagreements between <br />the Applicant and the Division during the reclamation phase, the Division requests the Applicant commit to a <br />minimum level of pit backfilling, should conditions shift to the impractical. These criteria should indicate <br />which areas have the highest priority for backfilling and which are the lowest. These criteria should stress <br />safety, water quality and aesthetics (and others if appropriate) as reasons for ranking. <br />RESPONSE: Based on the anticipated mine plan as presented in Section 5.7.3 of the Project Description <br />within Volume 1 of the application, the highest priorities for backfill to occur would be the main portion of the <br />WHEX and western portion of the Globe Hill, should development of those areas occur. CC &V is committed <br />to backfill these areas to promote free drainage of storm water runoff from these areas. The establishment of <br />free drainage of storm water runoff is consistent with prior amendment applications reviewed and approved <br />for the Cresson Project. The next priority would be the northern part of the WHEX portion of the East <br />Cresson Mine area and Schist Island portion of the North Cresson Mine area should development of those <br />areas occur. CC &V is committed to backfill these areas to the approximate existing ground surface. The <br />lowest priority for backfill would occur in the Main Cresson Mine area at the end of the expected mine life. <br />As also presented in Section 12.4.1 of the Project Description within Volume I of the application, should <br />development of the North Cresson occur, CC &V is committed to North Cresson Mine Area Viewshed <br />Conservation Plan. <br />52. Page 12 -14, 3`d paragraph — the Applicant states the relocated Grassy Valley stormwater drainage will be lined <br />with clay to prevent infiltration into the active mining area. Flow velocities (transporting colloidal silts) in <br />excess of five feet per second can erode the clay lining. Please discuss how the clay lining will be protected <br />from erosion. <br />RESPONSE: These are several means that can be implemented to protected clay lining from erosion that <br />have previously been implemented at the Cresson Project, if needed. As implemented in the previously <br />presented and approved "Sediment Pond" west of the AGVLF in Section 30 on Drawing C-4 of the <br />Amendment No. 9 application for the Mine Life Extension Project in 2008, CC &V is committed to <br />implementing means of controlling erosion of clay lined ponds. For example, CC &V could use of rip rap <br />channels into the pond and/or place, to a minimum depth, a layer of cover rock on clay that does not reduce <br />the overall required storage capacity of the pond. If deemed necessary at the time of construction of the <br />facility, protective means for the clay material will be implemented if flow velocities (transporting colloidal <br />silts) are expected to be in excess offive feet per second across the clay lining. <br />53. Page 12 -16, 2nd paragraph — the Applicant states that portions of benches created during operations will be <br />retained and the overall reclaimed slope of the VLF will be 2.5H:1 V. Please provide a minimum criterion for <br />intrabench slopes for reclamation. <br />RESPONSE: Prior amendment applications reviewed and approved for the Cresson Project stated that <br />portions of benches created during operations will be retained and the overall reclaimed slope of the VLF will <br />be 2.5H.•IV, more specifically, the languages states the following: "the slopes of the VLFs will be <br />recontoured to an overall slope of approximately 2.5H. I V. Portions of the benches created during operations <br />will be retained, as appropriate, for geotechnical and erosional stability. The topography shown on Drawing <br />F -1 and the financial warranty calculations presented in Section 13.0 of this Project Description have been <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.