Laserfiche WebLink
68. <br />from ground water aquifers. Nonetheless, such monitoring is required. Only with the <br />results of measurements at existing mines can projections be made for future mines. <br />Considering than the probable importance of subirrigated alluvial valley floors, <br />and the potential for disrupting the hydrologic and biologic functions thereof, it <br />was considered appropriate to evaluate the amount of land that would be classified <br />as subirrigated alluvial valley floors. This paper reports efforts directed at the <br />identification of alluvial valley floors as those areas are defined in proposed <br />national legislation. Appendix 2 provides quotations from legislative proposals and <br />Committee Conference Reports that have addressed mining in alluvial valley floors. <br />These proposals may be summarized as indicating that an alluvial valley floor is: <br />- A geologic unit comprised of several parts: an active (as opposed to <br />abandoned or buried) stream channel (perennial, intermittent, or ephemeral), <br />a flood plain, and an adjacent low terrace, including alluvium with suffi- <br />cient soil depth and suitable texture to support perennial grasses suit- <br />able for grazing or other agricultural use, and with sufficient channel <br />stability to allow agricultural use; <br />- A hydrologic unit in which the natural surface water and ground water is <br />adequate to support agricultural activities such as hay production, by <br />virtue of sufficient moisture held available to enable continued growth <br />of suitable vegetation during the dryer summer and fall months; <br />- A topographically - defined area in which the floor plain and adjacent low <br />terraces may be irrigated by simple spreading of ephemeral waters and /or <br />by simple diversion of natural flow *, and <br />- An area of land used for farming. <br />This report includes both a reconnaissance identification of subirrigated allu- <br />vial valley floors, through analysis of surface features, and a preliminary analysis <br />of hypothetical subsurface conditions that appear representative of actual condi- <br />tions. It was not possible to investigate the actual uses or productivity of those <br />areas mapped as alluvial valley floors. In the context of proposed legislation, it <br />is therefore inappropriate to directly transfer the areas of alluvial valley floors <br />presented herein to an impact on surface - mineable coal since the proposed legisla- <br />tion applies to farmed areas (and to water quantity and quality) and "farmed areas" <br />are not identified. It is similarly inappropriate to conclude that this study has <br />adequately documented the hydrologic and biological systems that exist in alluvial <br />valley floors. We have, however, attempted to provide an analysis of specific im- <br />pacts on the hydrologic system that may result from surface methods of mining shal- <br />low coals. This study draws upon research performed by others to initiate an <br />analysis of whether those functions of alluvial valley floors deemed critical in the <br />study can be reestablished during mining and reclamation. <br />Research to Data <br />The concept of alluvial valley floors utilized recently is new to those not <br />directly associated with western agriculture. Little research has been initiated on <br />the geohydrologic and biologic inter - relationships within alluvial valley floors or <br />on land use activities conducted therein. This section discusses pertinent investi- <br />gations reported to date. <br />* We assume that the practice of spreading flood waters includes simple furrows and <br />temporary stream diversions, but excludes extensive grading of land and /or construc- <br />tion of canals. These latter efforts may be used to convey water from streams and <br />impoundments to high terraces covered with thin alluvium and colluvium and lying <br />outside the subirrigated alluvial valleys. <br />69. <br />The United States Geological Survey of the U. S. Department of the Interior <br />conducted a field reconnaissance mapping of alluvial valley floors in the three - <br />county portion of the Powder River Basin of southeastern Montana in 1975 ( Malde and <br />Boyles, 1976). In that study alluvial valley floors were defined as those low ter- <br />race and flood plain areas of drainages whose vegetation, in terms of species and <br />cover, reflected the near surface availability of water. Terraces generally not <br />higher than 1.5 meters above the channel floor of small streams and not higher than <br />2.5 meters above the channel floor of principal streams were included in the alluvial <br />valley floor description. Areas obtaining all or the vast majority of water for <br />vegetation from ditch irrigation were not knowingly included. <br />Malde and Boyles had no direct ground water data justifying their criteria and <br />had to depend on knowledge of geologic and biologic phenomena. The areas mapped as <br />alluvial valley floors supported vegetation systems dominated by grasses and often <br />mixed with silver sagebrush (Artemisia cana) along small streams and in the upper <br />reaches of large streams. Greasewood (Sarcobatus) and big sagebrush (Artemisia tri- <br />dentate) were absent or rare in the alluvial valley floors mapped by Melds and <br />Boyles. Greasewood and big sagebrush were usually considered indicators of deeper <br />ground water and thus to be. located outside the alluvial valley floor. <br />Malde and Boyles found that: (1) larger alluvial valley floors were found along <br />the larger streams of the study area; (2) alluvial valley floor width generally in- <br />creases in the downstream direction; (3) alluvial valley floors are generally con- <br />tinuous upstream from the mainatem of major rivers to the point where vegetative <br />and terrace characteristics are lost; and (4) comparing the areas mapped with coal <br />resource data, less than three percent of the area of strippable coal in the south- <br />eastern Montana study area is overlain by alluvial valley floors. Thus the size of <br />alluvial valley floors was found, in practice, to be a direct function of annual <br />flows, but to be a relatively small area of the entire coal region in southeastern <br />Montana. We have visited the area between Birney Day School and Decker, Montana, <br />mapped by Malde and Boyles and, based on our agreement with their mapping boundaries, <br />concur with their findings, though the vegetation and topographic criteria may not <br />be completely applicable for all climates and physiographic provinces in other areas <br />of Montana and the interior western United States. <br />Malde and Boyles' work is reconnaissance to the extent that no direct measure- <br />ment of ground water levels, soil moisture, species composition, productivity, or <br />land use was made. However, it is one of two published mappings of alluvial valley <br />floors and provides a good estimate of the nature and extent of such areas in the <br />Powder River Basin of the Northern Great Plains. In the recent past, their efforts <br />have been further confirmed by detailed field mapping of alluvial deposits by the <br />U. S. Geological Survey ( Malde, personal communication, 1976). <br />A similar field reconnaissance study and mapping was recently conducted by the <br />Water Quality Bureau, Montana Department of Health and Environmental Sciences in <br />Dawson, Richland, and Garfield Counties in the Williston Basin of northeastern Mon- <br />tana (Schmidt, 1977). This area, underlain by strippable lignite deposits, has a <br />different physiography, climate, and land use pattern than the area studied by Malde <br />and Boyles. Notable differences include the presence of glacial till and glacial <br />landforms, the occurrence of many saline soils, the existence of larger deposits of <br />gravel which outcrop in valley areas, and recent changes in land use for wheat and <br />bay production. The major difference was the inclusion of somewhat higher terraces <br />in the definition of alluvial valley floors since field surveys gave evidence of <br />subirrigation at higher elevations above the stream channel than were found by Malde <br />and Boyles. Schmidt found significant concentrations of silver sagebrush outside <br />the alluvial valley floor areas. These differences illustrate the regional diversity <br />of alluvial valley floors due to climate, hydrology, and physiography and demonstrate <br />the need for field assessments of alluvial valley floors if one is to be certain of <br />their nature and of their role in local land use patterns. <br />More specifically, Schmidt found vegetative evidence of shallow ground water on <br />terraces 2.5 meters above the stream channel along small streams and on three -meter <br />