62.
<br />species develop root systems that extend perhaps ten meters deep to obtain
<br />sufficient water, but many grass species favored for hay are more shallow rooted
<br />(i.e., on the order of two meters in depth). Examples of these grasses include such
<br />native species as canada wildrye (Elymus canadensis), little bluestem (Andropogon
<br />scoparigs), and blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis). The relatively shallow, tibrous
<br />nature root systems characteristic of these grasses is documented by Heath et al.
<br />(1973) and Weaver (1968). The deeper- rooted species include forbs and woody plants
<br />which serve a useful role in supporting game animals and afford cover and forage for
<br />domesticated animals such as cattle or sheep. Usually the vegetative growth of an
<br />alluvial valley includes native grasses. At times the alluvial valley floor may in-
<br />clude alfalfa; however, alfalfa is generally considered to be a deep - rooted phreato-
<br />phyte and may also be grown outside an alluvial valley. The alluvial valley can be
<br />important for agriculture in that it not only provides forage during the growing
<br />season, but also can provide sufficient vegetative growth for forage to be cut and
<br />stored for winter use. It is often possible to obtain three cuttings of hay in sub -
<br />irrigated alluvial valley floors.
<br />The agricultural and wildlife uses of lands in the interior western United
<br />States* have been prominent since they provide the principal source of income.
<br />Though oil and gas production and now coal mining have provided some development and
<br />economic support to the region, they are activities which remove a non - renewable re-
<br />source and which might be considered temporary compared to farming, ranching, fish-
<br />ing, hunting and enjoyment of scenery. It is important to insure that the agricul-
<br />tural and recreational economy is as strong, if not stronger, after mining as it was
<br />prior to mining. Thus, if the alluvial valley floor is critical to the success of
<br />a ranch or to the maintenance of local wildlife populations, these vital functions
<br />must be protected - at least until such time as it is demonstrated that the alluvial
<br />valley floor's usefulness may be efficiently and economically replaced by an alter-
<br />native source of domestic fodder and /or wildlife habitat.
<br />Surface mining of coal has the potential, in the western United States, to
<br />temporarily, and even permanently, change the ground water flow system. If the mine
<br />involves disturbances of saturated strata or aquifers, it is likely that while
<br />mining, the local water table(s) will drop somewhat and ground water flow will be
<br />intercepted by, or will be directed toward the mine pit. But this is a temporary
<br />situation, since in most cases the water table will be reestablished after mining is
<br />completed and the mine pits are backfilled and graded. However, if the mining dis-
<br />turbs confining strata that serve to isolate aquifers ** which have significantly
<br />different potentiometric heads, such as that which appears to occur in the Sarpy
<br />Creek watershed in southeastern Montana, there may be a significant change in the
<br />depth to water after mining and reclamation.
<br />Changes in the water table will also affect the postmining use of subirrigated
<br />alluvial valley floors. If changes in the depth to the water table are more than
<br />a few meters, it appears reasonable to expect some effects on vegetation in lowland
<br />areas. Phreatophytes (alfalfa, for example) are especially sensitive to changes in
<br />the depth to available water. Grasses with fibrous root systems are not able to
<br />penetrate deeply into the substrate. Such vegetation may be adversely affected if
<br />the post- mining water table is deeper or if the post - mining moisture holding capa-
<br />city of the growth medium is significantly reduced. Effects on vegetation could
<br />involve a shift toward deeper- rooted and more drought - resistant vegetation, or a
<br />shift to shallow- rooted vegetation (the latter if the depth to water is decreased).
<br />Thus strata functioning as relatively impermeable lower boundaries for water tables
<br />in the alluvial valley floors might have to be recreated after mining to prevent
<br />undesirable lowering of the water table.
<br />* The term "interior western United States" is loosely used to include North Dakota,
<br />South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona.
<br />** Aquifer: relatively permeable rock containing and conducting sufficient ground
<br />water to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs.
<br />63.
<br />Extensive mining of an alluvial valley floor, even when followed by reclamation,
<br />has the potential to produce impacts on uses of that water, both at the mine site
<br />and wherever the affected water flows. Overburden material (or spoil) returned to
<br />the mined area is in many cases more susceptible to oxidation and leaching of the
<br />elements than was the undisturbed overburden. Salts concentrations often increase
<br />after mining and are noteworthy since high salt concentrations in the soil solution
<br />impede the uptake of water by plant roots. High sodium concentrations (relative to
<br />calcium and magnesium) can also detrimentally affect the soil structure and conse-
<br />quent uptake of water and oxygen by plants.
<br />Table I contains representative results of ground water quality measurements
<br />collected by the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology from two surface coal mining
<br />areas in southeastern Montana. Examination of this limited amount of water quality
<br />data first suggests that concentrations are highly variable and conclusions cannot
<br />be drawn,. However, the analyses of ground waters near Decker, Montana, do suggest
<br />that spoiled overburden contains water with higher concentrations of most elements
<br />than water obtained from undisturbed overburden and coal (the strong exception is
<br />the carbonate ion). Spoils waters at the Decker mine are higher in specific con-
<br />ductance than waters collected from the shallow alluvium, undisturbed overburden,
<br />and coal. The increase is due, principally, to calcium, sodium, bicarbonate, and
<br />sulfate concentrations. However, indicative of data variability is the fact that
<br />the second - highest specific conductance at Decker mine was found in a sample col-
<br />lected from undisturbed overburden, and that concentration is higher than one of the
<br />spoil water samples collected at the same mine.
<br />Water quality data from ground water samples collected near Colstrip, Montana,
<br />show trends similar to those collected near Decker (Table I). Spoils water is some-
<br />what higher in specific conductance than waters from undisturbed overburden and coal.
<br />The ions contributing chiefly to this increase are calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate,
<br />and sulfate. Although sodium content.was higher in Decker spoils water, it is lower
<br />in Colstrip soils water than in undisturbed overburden and coal. On the other hand,
<br />magnesium levels are higher in Colstrip spoils water, but about the same in spoils
<br />and undisturbed overburden at Decker.
<br />It should be noted that the data in Table I are from samples which do not neces-
<br />sarily represent a long term, "before and after mining" analysis (i.e., no samples
<br />were collected in the same area before and after mining a particular location.)
<br />Thus comparison of the quality of water in undisturbed overburden and spoils does
<br />not necessarily indicate expected water quality following complete "reclamation ".
<br />However, we do conclude that spoiled overburden contains ground water of poorer
<br />quality than in nearby undisturbed overburden and water- bearing coal seams, and thus
<br />that newly spoiled overburden has the potential, at least in selected circumstances,
<br />to produce ground water of relatively poorer quality. Whether deterioration in
<br />water quality will significantly affect overlying vegetation is not known. However,
<br />initial stands of vegetation on regraded lands at the Decker mine appear to be
<br />healthy one and two years following seeding. In the case of coal mining near Decker,
<br />Montana *, it has been projected that spoils water will have dissolved solids content
<br />ranging from 4,000 to 7,000 mg /1, principally sodium and sulfate, (USDI and State of
<br />Montana, 1976), It is also concluded that in spite of these high levels of dis-
<br />solved solids in ground water, the cumulative impacts of the Decker operations ad-
<br />jacent to the Tongue River Reservoir on reservoir water quality, and thus on water
<br />uses, will be insignificant and difficult to detect.
<br />Rahn (1976) has statistically analyzed twenty -eight ground and surface water
<br />samples collected from eight mines ** in northeastern Wyoming and southeastern
<br />* Current mining at the Decker and Rosebud mines at Colstrip does not involve direct
<br />disturbance of subirrigated alluvial valley floors.
<br />* *Wyodak Mine, Big Horn Mine, Decker Mine, Rosebud Mine (Colstrip), Big Sky Mine,
<br />Hidden Water Mine (abandoned), Antelope Mine, and Bell Ayr Mine. Appendix 1 pro-
<br />vides a more complete listing of surface coal mines examined for alluvial valley
<br />floors in this report.
<br />
|