Laserfiche WebLink
62. <br />species develop root systems that extend perhaps ten meters deep to obtain <br />sufficient water, but many grass species favored for hay are more shallow rooted <br />(i.e., on the order of two meters in depth). Examples of these grasses include such <br />native species as canada wildrye (Elymus canadensis), little bluestem (Andropogon <br />scoparigs), and blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis). The relatively shallow, tibrous <br />nature root systems characteristic of these grasses is documented by Heath et al. <br />(1973) and Weaver (1968). The deeper- rooted species include forbs and woody plants <br />which serve a useful role in supporting game animals and afford cover and forage for <br />domesticated animals such as cattle or sheep. Usually the vegetative growth of an <br />alluvial valley includes native grasses. At times the alluvial valley floor may in- <br />clude alfalfa; however, alfalfa is generally considered to be a deep - rooted phreato- <br />phyte and may also be grown outside an alluvial valley. The alluvial valley can be <br />important for agriculture in that it not only provides forage during the growing <br />season, but also can provide sufficient vegetative growth for forage to be cut and <br />stored for winter use. It is often possible to obtain three cuttings of hay in sub - <br />irrigated alluvial valley floors. <br />The agricultural and wildlife uses of lands in the interior western United <br />States* have been prominent since they provide the principal source of income. <br />Though oil and gas production and now coal mining have provided some development and <br />economic support to the region, they are activities which remove a non - renewable re- <br />source and which might be considered temporary compared to farming, ranching, fish- <br />ing, hunting and enjoyment of scenery. It is important to insure that the agricul- <br />tural and recreational economy is as strong, if not stronger, after mining as it was <br />prior to mining. Thus, if the alluvial valley floor is critical to the success of <br />a ranch or to the maintenance of local wildlife populations, these vital functions <br />must be protected - at least until such time as it is demonstrated that the alluvial <br />valley floor's usefulness may be efficiently and economically replaced by an alter- <br />native source of domestic fodder and /or wildlife habitat. <br />Surface mining of coal has the potential, in the western United States, to <br />temporarily, and even permanently, change the ground water flow system. If the mine <br />involves disturbances of saturated strata or aquifers, it is likely that while <br />mining, the local water table(s) will drop somewhat and ground water flow will be <br />intercepted by, or will be directed toward the mine pit. But this is a temporary <br />situation, since in most cases the water table will be reestablished after mining is <br />completed and the mine pits are backfilled and graded. However, if the mining dis- <br />turbs confining strata that serve to isolate aquifers ** which have significantly <br />different potentiometric heads, such as that which appears to occur in the Sarpy <br />Creek watershed in southeastern Montana, there may be a significant change in the <br />depth to water after mining and reclamation. <br />Changes in the water table will also affect the postmining use of subirrigated <br />alluvial valley floors. If changes in the depth to the water table are more than <br />a few meters, it appears reasonable to expect some effects on vegetation in lowland <br />areas. Phreatophytes (alfalfa, for example) are especially sensitive to changes in <br />the depth to available water. Grasses with fibrous root systems are not able to <br />penetrate deeply into the substrate. Such vegetation may be adversely affected if <br />the post- mining water table is deeper or if the post - mining moisture holding capa- <br />city of the growth medium is significantly reduced. Effects on vegetation could <br />involve a shift toward deeper- rooted and more drought - resistant vegetation, or a <br />shift to shallow- rooted vegetation (the latter if the depth to water is decreased). <br />Thus strata functioning as relatively impermeable lower boundaries for water tables <br />in the alluvial valley floors might have to be recreated after mining to prevent <br />undesirable lowering of the water table. <br />* The term "interior western United States" is loosely used to include North Dakota, <br />South Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona. <br />** Aquifer: relatively permeable rock containing and conducting sufficient ground <br />water to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. <br />63. <br />Extensive mining of an alluvial valley floor, even when followed by reclamation, <br />has the potential to produce impacts on uses of that water, both at the mine site <br />and wherever the affected water flows. Overburden material (or spoil) returned to <br />the mined area is in many cases more susceptible to oxidation and leaching of the <br />elements than was the undisturbed overburden. Salts concentrations often increase <br />after mining and are noteworthy since high salt concentrations in the soil solution <br />impede the uptake of water by plant roots. High sodium concentrations (relative to <br />calcium and magnesium) can also detrimentally affect the soil structure and conse- <br />quent uptake of water and oxygen by plants. <br />Table I contains representative results of ground water quality measurements <br />collected by the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology from two surface coal mining <br />areas in southeastern Montana. Examination of this limited amount of water quality <br />data first suggests that concentrations are highly variable and conclusions cannot <br />be drawn,. However, the analyses of ground waters near Decker, Montana, do suggest <br />that spoiled overburden contains water with higher concentrations of most elements <br />than water obtained from undisturbed overburden and coal (the strong exception is <br />the carbonate ion). Spoils waters at the Decker mine are higher in specific con- <br />ductance than waters collected from the shallow alluvium, undisturbed overburden, <br />and coal. The increase is due, principally, to calcium, sodium, bicarbonate, and <br />sulfate concentrations. However, indicative of data variability is the fact that <br />the second - highest specific conductance at Decker mine was found in a sample col- <br />lected from undisturbed overburden, and that concentration is higher than one of the <br />spoil water samples collected at the same mine. <br />Water quality data from ground water samples collected near Colstrip, Montana, <br />show trends similar to those collected near Decker (Table I). Spoils water is some- <br />what higher in specific conductance than waters from undisturbed overburden and coal. <br />The ions contributing chiefly to this increase are calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, <br />and sulfate. Although sodium content.was higher in Decker spoils water, it is lower <br />in Colstrip soils water than in undisturbed overburden and coal. On the other hand, <br />magnesium levels are higher in Colstrip spoils water, but about the same in spoils <br />and undisturbed overburden at Decker. <br />It should be noted that the data in Table I are from samples which do not neces- <br />sarily represent a long term, "before and after mining" analysis (i.e., no samples <br />were collected in the same area before and after mining a particular location.) <br />Thus comparison of the quality of water in undisturbed overburden and spoils does <br />not necessarily indicate expected water quality following complete "reclamation ". <br />However, we do conclude that spoiled overburden contains ground water of poorer <br />quality than in nearby undisturbed overburden and water- bearing coal seams, and thus <br />that newly spoiled overburden has the potential, at least in selected circumstances, <br />to produce ground water of relatively poorer quality. Whether deterioration in <br />water quality will significantly affect overlying vegetation is not known. However, <br />initial stands of vegetation on regraded lands at the Decker mine appear to be <br />healthy one and two years following seeding. In the case of coal mining near Decker, <br />Montana *, it has been projected that spoils water will have dissolved solids content <br />ranging from 4,000 to 7,000 mg /1, principally sodium and sulfate, (USDI and State of <br />Montana, 1976), It is also concluded that in spite of these high levels of dis- <br />solved solids in ground water, the cumulative impacts of the Decker operations ad- <br />jacent to the Tongue River Reservoir on reservoir water quality, and thus on water <br />uses, will be insignificant and difficult to detect. <br />Rahn (1976) has statistically analyzed twenty -eight ground and surface water <br />samples collected from eight mines ** in northeastern Wyoming and southeastern <br />* Current mining at the Decker and Rosebud mines at Colstrip does not involve direct <br />disturbance of subirrigated alluvial valley floors. <br />* *Wyodak Mine, Big Horn Mine, Decker Mine, Rosebud Mine (Colstrip), Big Sky Mine, <br />Hidden Water Mine (abandoned), Antelope Mine, and Bell Ayr Mine. Appendix 1 pro- <br />vides a more complete listing of surface coal mines examined for alluvial valley <br />floors in this report. <br />