My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-06-20_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 (87)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2012-06-20_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 (87)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:01:22 PM
Creation date
8/27/2012 10:06:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/20/2012
Doc Name
Draft EPA Report 1977a of Negative AVF
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix 2.06.8-1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Summary and Conclusions <br />Reconnaissance mapping of subirrigated alluvial valley floors was conducted to <br />determine how much land might be involved if special legislation evolved to protect <br />areas of agricultural importance, and, indirectly, how much coal might he affected <br />if mining of alluvial valley floors was determined to he environmentally unacceptable. <br />This reconnaissance effort defines the limits of subirrigated alluvial valley floors <br />adequately enough to serve as a basis for making first estimates of surface mineable <br />coal that may be affected if the alluvial valley floors cannot be mined. A recon- <br />naissance study does not provide sufficient information to estimate how much of the <br />coal that lies outside the alluvial valley floor might be affected. Th lysis <br />appears possible only with additional experience in mines located . a to tions, <br />including those outside alluvial valley floors, or with detail , .-y i g forma- <br />tion that accurately describes the alluvial valley floor al <br />source, and the effect of the reclamation procedures propo ;s' sis does <br />confirm the suggestions of others that about three percent ppable coal <br />resources of the western United States underlies subirrigate uvial valley floors. <br />The impact of alluvial valley floor protection requirements on the amount of surface <br />mineable coal available may be expected to be about 14% 1f` reclamation is not possi- <br />ble. In the judgement of the authors, only where there is a considerable density of <br />alluvial valley floors is it likely that mining plans cannot be developed to exclude <br />mining of such areas. It is likely that the critical functions of some alluvial val- <br />ley floors can be reestablished except where complex surface and groun3 water systems <br />are present and when shallow ground water quality is severely degraded as it passes <br />through spoils. <br />This reconnaissance identification of the topographic (with some regard for geo- <br />morphology) and vegetative characteristics of alluvial valley floors within lands <br />leased for coal extraction by surface methods provides a basis for estimating that <br />three percent of the leaseholds in the interior western United States are overlain <br />by alluvial valley floors. These alluvial valley floor designations encompass a <br />land unit with a geohydrologic and biologic interrelationship that may be critical <br />to the viability of an agricultural economy. However, the economic importance of <br />the alluvial valley floor has not been assessed. <br />Alluvial valley floors are quite common in the Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado <br />'areas of coal development, but are less common in the coal regions of North Dakota, <br />southwestern Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona. "Less common" refers to the <br />size and amount of land identified as alluvial valley floors. For example, the mines <br />examined in Arizona included areas of alluvial valley floors, but the area involved <br />was less than 0.5 percent of the land area examined. Identification of these allu- <br />vial valley floors was accomplished through the use of aerial imagery, topographic <br />maps, previous studies, and knowledge gained from past site visits. <br />Though it has been found to be a unique circumstance when any existing western <br />coal mine is located entirely within, an alluvial valley floor, alluvial valley floors <br />may be supported by a coal seam aquifer system* that extends out from the alluvial <br />valley. Thertfore, the effects of mining an area of recharge may extend to an allu- <br />vial valley floor. In this case, the amount of coal affected could easily be raised <br />if reclamation were not possible (e.g., if shallow ground water quality were de- <br />graded so as to interfere with use in the alluvial valley). In alluvial valley <br />floors containing relatively thick coals overlain by thin overburden as well as in <br />areas where alluvial aquifers are in a sense "perched" over the aquifer surface mine- <br />able coal, all coal may have to be withheld at least until the details of the natu- <br />ral system and the proposed' mining plan provide the necessary assurance that areas <br />may be reclaimed, at least to pre - mining productivity (and land uses). <br />* A moderately fractured coal seam which, often in combination with sandy strata, <br />transmits sufficient water to be classified as an aquifer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.