Laserfiche WebLink
Table 2.05.6(3) -1 <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2 <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -la <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -lb <br />Appendix 2.05.6(3) -1c <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2a <br />Table 2.05.6(3) -2b <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2a <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2b <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2c <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2d <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2e <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2f <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -2g <br />List of Tables <br />Water Quality Comparison — Overburden Water 22 <br />(GW -N9) vs. Spoil Water (Spoil Spring) <br />NHN Backfill Spring Predicted Impact <br />on Receiving Streams <br />List of Figures <br />Figure 2.05.6(3) -1 North -South Section Showing Drainage In Backfill <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -1 <br />BBA Water Consultant Report <br />WRS, LLC Report on Augmentation Plan <br />Approved Water Augmentation Plan <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -2 <br />Summary of Hydrologic Consequences <br />Flow Rates vs. TDS <br />GW -N8 Hydrograph <br />GW -N9 Hydrograph <br />Projected Draw Down <br />Hydrograph Modeling Procedures and Assumptions <br />MODFLOW Overburden Water Level <br />MODFLOW Draw Down <br />Monitoring Well Water Levels <br />Distance /Drawdown Summary <br />APPENDIX 2.05.6(3) -3 <br />NHN Mine Hydrologic Monitoring Plan <br />30 <br />17 <br />November 2011 <br />