Laserfiche WebLink
128 SOIL SCI. SOC. AM. J., VOL. 45, 1981 <br />Table 7 —Water used during the 1978 growing season as affected <br />by crop and soil thickness. <br />Topsoil thickness <br />Subsoil <br />Crop thickness 0 cm 20 cm 60 cm and subsoil <br />cm <br />Alfalfa 30 27 32 <br />150 25 27 <br />L.S.D. (0.05) = 3.0 <br />Crested 30 24 27 <br />wheatgrass 150 23 26 <br />L.S.D. (0.05) = 1.9 <br />Native grasses 30 29 33 <br />150 27 29 <br />L.S.D. (0.05) = 3.5 <br />Wheat 30 29 28 <br />150 29 32 <br />L.S.D. (0.05) = 2.4 <br />Mixed topsoil <br />30 27 <br />26 25 <br />25 26 <br />27 26 <br />33 29 <br />31 29 <br />29 28 <br />31 33 <br />(Bond et al., 1971; Power and Alessi, 1970). Total <br />growing season water use for the various treatments <br />was calculated each year, and data for 1978 are pre- <br />sented in Table 7. Water used was calculated by add- <br />ing growing season precipitation to the change in soil <br />water content to 180 cm between spring seeding and <br />harvest. There was no evidence of runoff or deep per- <br />colation during this period. Generally, subsoil thick- <br />ness had little or no consistent effect upon total water <br />use, but water use was often greater where the crop <br />was grown on either 20 or 60 cm of topsoil. There <br />was very little difference between crops in amount of <br />water used. Thus, crop yields measured in 1978 were <br />poorly related to water use. A similar conclusion can <br />be made from data for other years also, probably be- <br />cause precipitation was seldom adequate to wet soil <br />material more than 100 to 120 cm. <br />Figure 2 depicts soil water content in the spring of <br />1975 and after harvest of the 1978 crop. Since these <br />two data sets represent approximately the wettest and <br />driest soil conditions encountered, differences between <br />these two curves represent maximum water withdrawal. <br />Depth of water withdrawal by dryland crops is <br />usually an indicator of depth of root activity (Bond et <br />al., 1971; Haas and Willis, 1962; Power and Alessi, <br />1970). Data in Fig. 2 illustrate that depth of root <br />activity, as determined by water withdrawal depth, was <br />usually only 15 to 30 cm greater where 150 cm or more <br />of permeable soil material was present than where <br />relatively impermeable mine spoils were within 30 <br />to 90 cm of the surface. Data are presented only for <br />the 20 -cm topsoil treatment because thickness of (or <br />even the absence of) topsoil over the permeable B- <br />horizon subsoil material had no appreciable influence <br />on depth of root activity. For all crops and topsoil <br />treatments, significant amounts of water were ex- <br />tracted 30 to 90 cm into the highly sodic spoils where <br />they were covered with only 30 cm of soil material. <br />Alfalfa generally extracted water to the greatest depth <br />(about 135 cm for 30 -cm subsoil treatments and about <br />175 cm for the 150 -cm subsoil treatments). Crested <br />wheatgrass was the next most effective, followed by <br />the native grasses and spring wheat —the latter ex- <br />tracting water to only about the 75- and 90 -cm depths <br />for the 30- and 150 -cm subsoil treatments, respectively. <br />It is conceivable that because of the decrease in <br />permeability at the soil -spoil interface, there might <br />have been a tendency for water to accumulate above <br />40. <br />80- <br />t1 120 <br />c 160 <br />to <br />2 <br />0 <br />a. <br />0 <br />40- <br />80- <br />120- <br />SOIL WATER CONTENT, cm / cm <br />0 .25 .50 0 .25 .59 0 .25 .50 0 .25 .50 <br />30 cm of SUBSOIL <br />1 <br />1 <br />AUGUST1 <br />1978 1 <br />• <br />MAY <br />1975 <br />I MAY <br />I / 1975 <br />AUGUST <br />- 1978 <br />1 <br />i <br />ALFALFA <br />150 cm of SUBSOIL <br />160- 1► <br />CRESTED NATIVE GRASS WHEAT <br />WHEATGRASS <br />Fig. 2 —Soil water content at beginning of experiment (spring <br />1976) and after harvest of third crop (fall 1978) as affected <br />by crop and soil thickness. <br />this interface almost to the point of saturation. From <br />data presented in Fig. 2 and from approximately <br />monthly soil water profiles, there is no evidence of <br />a buildup of soil water for any treatment at any time. <br />The results of this study indicate that a minimum <br />thickness of about 90 cm of soil material is required <br />to obtain maximum production of most crops under <br />the conditions encountered. For production of crops <br />such as spring_ wheat, topsoil and subsoil need to -- be <br />segregated to Obtain maximum yield. This require- <br />ment may possibly be related to a greater tendency <br />for crusting, compaction, and related phenomena that <br />could affect emergence and stand establishment and <br />seedling vigor in the absence of topsoil. Unfortu- <br />nately, no data are available on such factors from this <br />experiment. Because unprotected disturbed soil ma- <br />terial is highly erodible, and because upward salt mi- <br />gration may occur, possibly somewhat more than 90 <br />cm of soil material should be used in reconstructing <br />a soil profile to ensure that at least 90 cm of good <br />quality soil is available several years later. It should <br />again be emphasized that these results apply when <br />sodic, impermeable materials underlie the soil ma- <br />terial. Similar data from experiments on spoils less <br />hostile to plant growth are not yet available. <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br />We thank Basin Electric Power Cooperative and the Consoli- <br />dation Coal Company, who jointly provided the manpower <br />and equipment required for the earthmoving operations in- <br />volved. <br />