APPENDIX 2.05.4(2)(d) -1
<br />Effects of Topsoil and Subsoil Thickness on Soil Water Content and Crop Production
<br />on a Disturbed Soil'.
<br />J. F. POWER, F. M. SANDOVAL, R. E. RIES, AND S. D. MERRILL
<br />ABSTRACT
<br />Data by which we can quantify effects of soil depth upon
<br />productivity from controlled experiments are essentially lacking
<br />for semiarid regions. In connection with mined land — reclamation
<br />research in North Dakota, an experiment was established in
<br />which soil was reconstructed by building a wedge with produc-
<br />tive subsoil (B and upper C horizon) on top of leveled sodic
<br />mine spoils derived from shale. Thickness of the subsoil wedge
<br />ranged from 0 to 210 cm. Topsoil (A horizon) was then spread
<br />over the subsoil wedge to provide a topsoil either 0, 20, or 60
<br />cm thick. A fourth treatment consisted of mixing subsoil and
<br />topsoil within the wedge in a 3:1 ratio (no topsoil on the sur-
<br />face). Four crops — alfalfa (Medicago saliva L.), crested wheat -
<br />grass (Agropyron desertorum), native warm - season grasses (Bou-
<br />teloua gracilis and Bouteloua curtipendula), and spring wheat
<br />(Triticum aestivum L.) — were grown each year on these plots
<br />from 1975 through 1979.
<br />Yields of all crops increased as total soil thickness (topsoil
<br />plus subsoil) increased to the 90- to 150-cm range. Highest
<br />yields equaled or exceeded yields that would be expected in
<br />these years on similar undisturbed soil types under good man-
<br />agement in the same county. In most instances, over 90% of
<br />the maximum yields observed was obtained when 70 cm of sub-
<br />soil plus 20 cm of topsoil covered the sodic spoils (SAR = 25,
<br />clay = 38%). Yields from 60 cm of topsoil were similar to
<br />those from 20 cm of topsoil. With no topsoil, only native grama
<br />grasses produced over 75% of maximum, but all crops except
<br />wheat produced at least 90% of maximum with at least 90
<br />cm of the mixed subsoil. topsoil spread over spoils (wheat yields
<br />were only about 80% of maximum).
<br />Water was extracted from the upper 30 to 90 cm of spoils
<br />when the soil-spoil interface was within 90 cm of the soil sur-
<br />face. Thickness of topsoil had no influence on depth of water
<br />extraction. Alfalfa extracted water to about 135 cm if sodic
<br />spoils were within 90 cm of the surface and to about 175 cm
<br />where spoils were covered with at least 150 cm of soil materials.
<br />Depth of water extraction by crested wheatgrass under these
<br />two situations was about 120 and 150 cm; by native grasses
<br />about 80 and 120 cm; and by spring wheat about 75 and 90
<br />cm, respectively. There was no evidence of any accumulation
<br />of soil water just above the soil -spoil interface under any situa-
<br />tion.
<br />Additional Index Words: reclamation, mined -land reclama-
<br />tion, water use, soil depth, reconstructed soil.
<br />Power, J. F., F. M. Sandoval, R. E. Ries, and S. D. Merrill.
<br />1981, Effects of topsoil and subsoil thickness on soil water con-
<br />tent and crop production on a disturbed soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
<br />J. 45:124 -129.
<br />S OIL THICKNESS IS RECOGNIZED as an important param-
<br />eter in determining soil quality and productivity.
<br />Thickness of the genetic A and B horizons is an im-
<br />portant criterion in the classification and management
<br />of natural soils, and plays a major role in determining
<br />land values.
<br />Earlier research showed that the presence of a few
<br />centimeters of topsoil helped restore productivity to
<br />cut areas resulting from land - leveling (Carlson et al.,
<br />1961). Likewise, some of the first research conducted
<br />on sodic mine spoils resulting from strip mining in
<br />North Dakota gave similar results (Power et al., 1975).
<br />In recent years, Legislation has been enacted in the
<br />124
<br />United States requiring original soil material to be
<br />saved and replaced on mine spoils after shaping.
<br />Even with this knowledge and current legislation,
<br />available literature generally lacks quantitative data
<br />on the effects of soil thickness upon crop production.
<br />In most regions soil thickness may influence plant
<br />rooting depth and the quantity of soil water avail-
<br />able for plant growth, thereby affecting crop growth
<br />potentials. This relationship is especially important
<br />when the underlying material is a poor medium for
<br />plant root activity, as are sodic mine spoils (Power
<br />et al., 1975). The research reported here was initiated
<br />to rovide quantitative data on how
<br />(B upper C -horizons) and topsoil (A horizon)
<br />thickn_ffect the amount of w ater extracted and the
<br />de•th of extraction, and subsequently upon growth
<br />anityield of several crops important in semiarid agri-
<br />culture.
<br />METHODS
<br />Over 2 ha of sodic mine spoil at the Glenharold mine near
<br />Stanton, North Dakota, was leveled to 0.5% grade in the sum-
<br />mer of 1974, about I year after mining was complete. Spoils
<br />consisisted primarily of soft shale from the Tongue River mem-
<br />ber of the Fort Union geologic group and were relatively high
<br />in both exchangeable Na (Na adsorption ratio of about 25) and
<br />clay (Table 1).
<br />After leveling, subsoil (B and upper C horizons) was taken
<br />from an unmined Temvik silt loam (fine - silty, mixed Typic
<br />Haploborolls) and spread with motorized scrapers over the lev-
<br />eled spoils in a wedge that increased from 0 to 210 cm in thick-
<br />ness. The wedge of subsoil constructed was 52.5 m wide from
<br />toe (0 cm of subsoil) to top (210 cm of subsoil) and 240 m
<br />long giving the surface a 4% southerly slope. Thickness of sub-
<br />soil increased about 4 cm from each 1 m of distance upslope.
<br />The wedge was subdivided into 12 main plots, each 20 m
<br />wide and 52.5 m long. Three of the plot treatments consisted
<br />of covering the subsoil wedge with either 0, 20, or 60 cm of top-
<br />soil (A horizon from Temvik silt loam) uniformly from toe to
<br />top. The fourth main plot treatment consisted of thoroughly
<br />mixing subsoil and topsoil in a 3:1 ratio during construction.
<br />Each of these four main treatments was replicated three times.
<br />Properties of the subsoil and topsoil are listed in Table 1. Ap-
<br />proximately 20,000 m' of soil material was needed for construc-
<br />tion.
<br />Four subplots (4.2 m wide and 52.5 m long) and an alley 3.2
<br />m wide were established within each main plot. The alleys
<br />prevented soil mixing between train plots during construction
<br />and were also shaped to control runoff water (usually from
<br />snow melt) between main plots. Subplots were seeded at recom-
<br />mended rates and depths to four different crops in the spring
<br />of ]975 —hard red spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), alfalfa
<br />(Medicago saliva L.), crested wheatgrass (Agropyron deserto-
<br />rum), and a mixture of native warm- season grasses consisting
<br />of blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis) and side oats grama (Bou-
<br />teloua curtipendula). Before seeding, 35 kg P /ha as triple super-
<br />phosphate was broadcast on all subplots, and all but alfalfa sub-
<br />plots received 55 kg N /ha broadcast as ammonium nitrate. No
<br />K was required. Access tubes were installed to the 2 -m depth
<br />7.5 and 37.5 m from the toe of each subplot (30 and 150 cm
<br />subsoil, respectively, plus topsoil), and soil water content was
<br />determined to the 180 -cm depth with a neutron probe.
<br />At maturity, samples of wheat were harvested from 4.2- by
<br />"Contribution from the USDA-SEA-AR. Received 1 May 1980.
<br />Approved 15 Aug. 1980.
<br />Soil Scientists, Range Scientist, and Soil Scientist, respective-
<br />ly, Northern Great Plains Research Center, Mandan, ND 58556.
<br />Dr. Power is now in the Soil & Water Conservation Research
<br />Unit, SEA -AR, Univ. of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583.
<br />
|