Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDIX 2.05.4(2)(d) -1 <br />Effects of Topsoil and Subsoil Thickness on Soil Water Content and Crop Production <br />on a Disturbed Soil'. <br />J. F. POWER, F. M. SANDOVAL, R. E. RIES, AND S. D. MERRILL <br />ABSTRACT <br />Data by which we can quantify effects of soil depth upon <br />productivity from controlled experiments are essentially lacking <br />for semiarid regions. In connection with mined land — reclamation <br />research in North Dakota, an experiment was established in <br />which soil was reconstructed by building a wedge with produc- <br />tive subsoil (B and upper C horizon) on top of leveled sodic <br />mine spoils derived from shale. Thickness of the subsoil wedge <br />ranged from 0 to 210 cm. Topsoil (A horizon) was then spread <br />over the subsoil wedge to provide a topsoil either 0, 20, or 60 <br />cm thick. A fourth treatment consisted of mixing subsoil and <br />topsoil within the wedge in a 3:1 ratio (no topsoil on the sur- <br />face). Four crops — alfalfa (Medicago saliva L.), crested wheat - <br />grass (Agropyron desertorum), native warm - season grasses (Bou- <br />teloua gracilis and Bouteloua curtipendula), and spring wheat <br />(Triticum aestivum L.) — were grown each year on these plots <br />from 1975 through 1979. <br />Yields of all crops increased as total soil thickness (topsoil <br />plus subsoil) increased to the 90- to 150-cm range. Highest <br />yields equaled or exceeded yields that would be expected in <br />these years on similar undisturbed soil types under good man- <br />agement in the same county. In most instances, over 90% of <br />the maximum yields observed was obtained when 70 cm of sub- <br />soil plus 20 cm of topsoil covered the sodic spoils (SAR = 25, <br />clay = 38%). Yields from 60 cm of topsoil were similar to <br />those from 20 cm of topsoil. With no topsoil, only native grama <br />grasses produced over 75% of maximum, but all crops except <br />wheat produced at least 90% of maximum with at least 90 <br />cm of the mixed subsoil. topsoil spread over spoils (wheat yields <br />were only about 80% of maximum). <br />Water was extracted from the upper 30 to 90 cm of spoils <br />when the soil-spoil interface was within 90 cm of the soil sur- <br />face. Thickness of topsoil had no influence on depth of water <br />extraction. Alfalfa extracted water to about 135 cm if sodic <br />spoils were within 90 cm of the surface and to about 175 cm <br />where spoils were covered with at least 150 cm of soil materials. <br />Depth of water extraction by crested wheatgrass under these <br />two situations was about 120 and 150 cm; by native grasses <br />about 80 and 120 cm; and by spring wheat about 75 and 90 <br />cm, respectively. There was no evidence of any accumulation <br />of soil water just above the soil -spoil interface under any situa- <br />tion. <br />Additional Index Words: reclamation, mined -land reclama- <br />tion, water use, soil depth, reconstructed soil. <br />Power, J. F., F. M. Sandoval, R. E. Ries, and S. D. Merrill. <br />1981, Effects of topsoil and subsoil thickness on soil water con- <br />tent and crop production on a disturbed soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. <br />J. 45:124 -129. <br />S OIL THICKNESS IS RECOGNIZED as an important param- <br />eter in determining soil quality and productivity. <br />Thickness of the genetic A and B horizons is an im- <br />portant criterion in the classification and management <br />of natural soils, and plays a major role in determining <br />land values. <br />Earlier research showed that the presence of a few <br />centimeters of topsoil helped restore productivity to <br />cut areas resulting from land - leveling (Carlson et al., <br />1961). Likewise, some of the first research conducted <br />on sodic mine spoils resulting from strip mining in <br />North Dakota gave similar results (Power et al., 1975). <br />In recent years, Legislation has been enacted in the <br />124 <br />United States requiring original soil material to be <br />saved and replaced on mine spoils after shaping. <br />Even with this knowledge and current legislation, <br />available literature generally lacks quantitative data <br />on the effects of soil thickness upon crop production. <br />In most regions soil thickness may influence plant <br />rooting depth and the quantity of soil water avail- <br />able for plant growth, thereby affecting crop growth <br />potentials. This relationship is especially important <br />when the underlying material is a poor medium for <br />plant root activity, as are sodic mine spoils (Power <br />et al., 1975). The research reported here was initiated <br />to rovide quantitative data on how <br />(B upper C -horizons) and topsoil (A horizon) <br />thickn_ffect the amount of w ater extracted and the <br />de•th of extraction, and subsequently upon growth <br />anityield of several crops important in semiarid agri- <br />culture. <br />METHODS <br />Over 2 ha of sodic mine spoil at the Glenharold mine near <br />Stanton, North Dakota, was leveled to 0.5% grade in the sum- <br />mer of 1974, about I year after mining was complete. Spoils <br />consisisted primarily of soft shale from the Tongue River mem- <br />ber of the Fort Union geologic group and were relatively high <br />in both exchangeable Na (Na adsorption ratio of about 25) and <br />clay (Table 1). <br />After leveling, subsoil (B and upper C horizons) was taken <br />from an unmined Temvik silt loam (fine - silty, mixed Typic <br />Haploborolls) and spread with motorized scrapers over the lev- <br />eled spoils in a wedge that increased from 0 to 210 cm in thick- <br />ness. The wedge of subsoil constructed was 52.5 m wide from <br />toe (0 cm of subsoil) to top (210 cm of subsoil) and 240 m <br />long giving the surface a 4% southerly slope. Thickness of sub- <br />soil increased about 4 cm from each 1 m of distance upslope. <br />The wedge was subdivided into 12 main plots, each 20 m <br />wide and 52.5 m long. Three of the plot treatments consisted <br />of covering the subsoil wedge with either 0, 20, or 60 cm of top- <br />soil (A horizon from Temvik silt loam) uniformly from toe to <br />top. The fourth main plot treatment consisted of thoroughly <br />mixing subsoil and topsoil in a 3:1 ratio during construction. <br />Each of these four main treatments was replicated three times. <br />Properties of the subsoil and topsoil are listed in Table 1. Ap- <br />proximately 20,000 m' of soil material was needed for construc- <br />tion. <br />Four subplots (4.2 m wide and 52.5 m long) and an alley 3.2 <br />m wide were established within each main plot. The alleys <br />prevented soil mixing between train plots during construction <br />and were also shaped to control runoff water (usually from <br />snow melt) between main plots. Subplots were seeded at recom- <br />mended rates and depths to four different crops in the spring <br />of ]975 —hard red spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), alfalfa <br />(Medicago saliva L.), crested wheatgrass (Agropyron deserto- <br />rum), and a mixture of native warm- season grasses consisting <br />of blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis) and side oats grama (Bou- <br />teloua curtipendula). Before seeding, 35 kg P /ha as triple super- <br />phosphate was broadcast on all subplots, and all but alfalfa sub- <br />plots received 55 kg N /ha broadcast as ammonium nitrate. No <br />K was required. Access tubes were installed to the 2 -m depth <br />7.5 and 37.5 m from the toe of each subplot (30 and 150 cm <br />subsoil, respectively, plus topsoil), and soil water content was <br />determined to the 180 -cm depth with a neutron probe. <br />At maturity, samples of wheat were harvested from 4.2- by <br />"Contribution from the USDA-SEA-AR. Received 1 May 1980. <br />Approved 15 Aug. 1980. <br />Soil Scientists, Range Scientist, and Soil Scientist, respective- <br />ly, Northern Great Plains Research Center, Mandan, ND 58556. <br />Dr. Power is now in the Soil & Water Conservation Research <br />Unit, SEA -AR, Univ. of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583. <br />