My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-06-20_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 (49)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2012-06-20_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 (49)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:01:14 PM
Creation date
8/24/2012 9:58:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/20/2012
Doc Name
Mariah Report Wildlife Baseline
Section_Exhibit Name
Appendix 2.04.11-1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vegetation distribution (no habitat affinities), then the proportion of <br />individuals of a species encountered in a particular vegetation type would <br />correspond to the proportion of the sampling effort devoted to that <br />vegetation type. For example if 30% of the small mammal live traps were <br />established in upland sagebrush, then 30% of the total number of individuals <br />of all species captured over all sampling transects would have been caught <br />in the upland sagebrush habitat if the species were distributed randomly. <br />Conversely, if 90% Of all Peromyscus'maniculatus (deer mouse) captures <br />occurred i.n the upland sagebrush type, this would indicate a definite <br />affinity of D. maniculatus for the upland sagebrush vegetation type. <br />The Chi- squzara test (Snedecor and Cochran 1967) was used to determine <br />if the differences between the observed number of captures for a given <br />species in a given vegetation type and the number of captures expected on <br />the basis of a random distribution was significant. The Chi- square <br />statistic, X is given by <br />where: <br />X2= 0. -E.) 2 <br />observed number of captures (or encounters) for habitat i <br />Q <br />E = expected number of captures in habitat i based on a random <br />distribution among habitats. <br />The calculated Chi - square value'was compared to a Chi- square table to determine <br />if a significant difference between observed and expected number of captures <br />occurred at the 95% confidence level. If a significant difference did exist, <br />individual Chi - square values for individual habitats were examined to provide <br />an indication of those habitats for which a species shows an affinity or an <br />avoidance. <br />-15-- <br />.)UK 1 1 1980 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.