Laserfiche WebLink
requires that the mined areas be reclaimed to a higher use. Based upon this comparison, WFC <br />feels justified in proposing to use the existing Dryland Pasture Reference Area since it is already <br />the approved revegetation success standard of the Big Sagebrush vegetation type at the NH2 <br />Mine. <br />Irrigated Pasture. Disturbance to all lands corresponding to the Irrigated Pasture vegetation <br />type (IP) shown on Map 2.04.10 -1, Permit Area Vegetation Map will be reclaimed according to <br />the desires of the existing land owners. Mr. George Glasier, owner of the Glasier property has <br />stipulated in his lease with WFC that WFC will only be getting his land and not the water <br />associated with this tract. This condition essentially requires that all of irrigated pasture areas on <br />his land must be reclaimed as dryland pasture, since he has transferred his water rights to his <br />Silver Hawk property located on the San Miguel River near the Tri -State power plant. Mr. <br />Thomas Meehan has made similar requests of WFC relative to the irrigated pasture portions on <br />his property. The Garvey Brothers have stipulated in their lease with WFC, that all of the <br />existing land uses and hence corresponding vegetation types on their property must be reclaimed <br />to their predisturbance conditions. This means that only the Irrigated Pasture lands on the <br />Garvey Property will be reclaimed as irrigated pasture. <br />The reference area approach will be used to document final revegetation success of lands <br />reclaimed as Irrigated Pasture vegetation areas. Upon comparing the required plant parameters <br />of plant cover and production between the proposed Irrigated Pasture predisturbance areas and <br />the Irrigated Pasture reference area, and using the "t- test" pre - mining comparison found on page <br />16 of the Division's Guidelines for Compliance with Land Use and Vegetation Requirements <br />for Coal Mining, the calculated t value for plant cover was determined to equal 0.6231 and the <br />calculated t value for forage production was determined to equal 0.0892. The corresponding <br />tabular t value for plant cover was determined to be equal to 2.008 and 1.982 for production. <br />Since the calculated t values are less than the corresponding tabular t values, it can be <br />concluded that the Irrigated Pasture predisturbance area is statistically similar to the Irrigated <br />Pasture Reference Areas with respect to the required parameters of plant cover and forage <br />production. <br />Drvland Pasture. Disturbance to all areas corresponding to the Dryland Pasture vegetation type <br />(DP) shown on Map 2.04.10 -1, Permit Area Vegetation Map as corresponding to the DP areas, <br />will be reclaimed according to the currently approved land use of dryland pasture. The currently <br />approved Dryland Pasture Reference Area is located on the west side of the Hopkins Field <br />Airport. No changes are proposed beyond what the DRMS has already approved for this site in <br />the existing NH2 Mine Permit. Since DRMS has already approved the proposed revegetation <br />success standards for this type, no changes are being proposed for this vegetation type. <br />Upon comparing the proposed Dryland Pasture disturbance areas with the existing Dryland <br />Pasture Reference area, it can be determined that the calculated t value for total plant cover <br />equals 4.71 and the calculated t value for forage production equals 0.1918. The corresponding tt <br />Section 2.04.10 Page 32 November 2011 <br />