2012-06-20_PERMIT FILE - C2010089 ‎(43)‎

• Permit No: C2010089
• IBM Index Class Name: PERMIT FILE
• Doc Date: 6/20/2012
• Doc Name: Peabody Coal Analysis
• Section_Exhibit Name: Appendix Table 2.04.6-4
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

r•
a
Thickness Depth to Equivalent % Dry % Dry
Hole No. Seam (Ft.) Coal (Ft.) Dry BTU Moisture ( %) Ash Sulfur % Pyrite
1C Upper Dakota 1.8 31.8 13126 3.72 8.95 0.68
1C Lower Dakota 7.8 40.3 10954 4.11 23.39 0.87
2C Upper Dakota 1.7 27.5 08698 15.01 23.19 0.62
2C Lower Dakota 7.2 38.0 11949 3.73 15.48 0.82
3C Upper Dakota 1.9 67.8 13189 3.68 10.21 2.49
3C Lowy Dakota 7.1 77.2 11833 3.85 17.95 0.76
4C Upper Dakota 1.7 12.9 06791 ___* 35.11 0.44
4C Lower Dakota 5.7 23.3 09093 11.51 24.65 0.53
rn
�. 695 -E Lower Dakota 8.2 63.6 11038 3.73 23.27 0.61
co
695 -E Nucla 1.8 120.0 09919 3.91 29.76 0.66
697 -E Upper Dakota 1.7 50.7 13213 3.46 10.27 1.38
697-E Lower Dakota 7.7 59.2 11100 3.97 23.15 0.53
697 -E Nucla 3.4 92.4 09428 4.20 32.47 1.01
697 -E Nucla 3.2 95.8 10106 3.53 28.50 0.93
Appendix 2.04.6 -4
Peabody Coal Core Analysis
Table 6 -5. Coal Seam Analysis
Nucla Mine, Montrose County, Colorado
*Sample not large enough for equivalent moisture.
1 Production samples taken at the power plant have shown that .33% of all sulfur is pyritic sulfur.