My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-02-20_REVISION - M19977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M19977378
>
1991-02-20_REVISION - M19977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2021 8:00:25 PM
Creation date
8/23/2012 10:54:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/20/1991
Doc Name
1991 Proposed Reclamation Work
From
San Juan County Mining Venture- Sunnyside Mine
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
TR11
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TAILINGS POND #2 <br /> GEOTECHNICAL STUDY <br /> Western Technologies Inc. , was employed by San Juan County Mining <br /> Venture to perform a geotechnical study of Tailings Pond Number <br /> Two during the summer of 1990 . The study included field <br /> sampling, laboratory testing, and stability analyses for several <br /> different pond configurations . These analyses were performed on <br /> two slope cross sections both of which are adjacent to Boulder <br /> Creek. The slopes were analyzed for stability under the four <br /> following slope configurations. <br /> 1 . Existing slopes. <br /> 2. Slopes excavated to 2: 1 slope . <br /> 3 . Slopes excavated to 2 : 1 slope and 15 ' of fill placed on <br /> top of the pond. <br /> 4 . Slopes excavated to 2. 5 : 1 slope with 20 ' horizontal <br /> bench ten feet above Boulder Creek and 20 ' of fill <br /> placed on top of the pond. <br /> The resultant factors of safety against slope failure are <br /> presented in the table below. <br /> Slope Cross Section #3 Cross Section #5 <br /> Configuration Static Pseudo-Static Static Pseudo-Static <br /> 1 1 . 24 1 .06 1 . 38 1. 17 <br /> 2 1 . 55 1 . 25 1 . 59 1 . 29 <br /> 3 1 . 54 1 . 25 1 .62 1. 30 <br /> 4 1 . 54 1 . 20 1 . 89 1 . 47 <br /> The current minimum factors of safety for the pond <br /> indicate that is is stable however the factors of <br /> safety are unacceptably low. <br /> The proposed reclamation plan incorporates slope <br /> configuration number four . As illustrated in the table <br /> the minimum static and pseudostatic factors of safety <br /> for this configuration are, respectively, 1 . 54 and <br /> 1 . 20. <br /> -6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.