My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-08-23_REVISION - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1988-08-23_REVISION - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:38:54 PM
Creation date
8/23/2012 10:46:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/23/1988
Doc Name
Condition of Approval #3
From
Echo Bay
To
Sunnyside Gold Corp
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
XEROX TELECOPIER 295 ; 8-23-88; 4:48 PM; 4 &Ae-rui907 463 357b 1111111111111111111 <br /> RUG 23 188 14:56 WGM/EC'"' 9AY JUNEAU 907 463-3575 <br /> 999 <br /> vWx � ■ <br /> .�'. Project <br /> ,4,,_,ZC390 SAW SUFSPORATWIt <br /> Date: /August 23, 1988 <br /> To: Larry Perino, Sunnysid Project <br /> From: Frank W. Bergstrom ✓ <br /> pp <br /> Subject: <br /> Condition of Approval no.�3 to Amendment no. 3 to permit M-77-378 <br /> Condition of Approval no. 3 to the open pit mine permit <br /> (Amendment no. 3) states that an analysis of exploration drill <br /> core and acid drainage mitigative_ plan for waste-rock are to be <br /> submitted to and approved by MLRL) before "disposal" of waste-rock <br /> occurs. Disposal of waste-rock is, by the plan, in two permanent <br /> waste-rock piles numbered I and 2 on Exhibit C-1 of Amendment <br /> no. 3. These sites have the potential to create runoff which <br /> will drain off site and not pass through any current mine <br /> water treatment system. <br /> It was the interpretation of the Sunnyside Gold Environmental <br /> napart:meltnt: that t:ha Condition of Approval, as written, did not <br /> preclude the normal temporary stockpiling of waste-rock as a <br /> component of rock movement in and around the pit or for road <br /> or laydown area construction. The intent of the Condition was <br /> to preclude "disposal" of waste-rock in a permanent position <br /> until the acid drainage mitigative plan could be approved and <br /> implemented. <br /> To confirm this interpretation I phoned Ms. Camille Farrell at <br /> MLRD, Denver on June 201 1980 at 3:29 p.m. to inform her that a <br /> temporary waste-rock pile was being placed around the area shown <br /> as a contractor laydown area on Exhibit C-1 of Amendment no. 3. <br /> She was informed the detailed engineering plans had shown that <br /> considerably less waste-rock was to be produced than was <br /> calculated in the Amendment no. 3 document. As ,such, it was <br /> desirable to retain waste-rock as close to the Emma Stops as <br /> possible to facilitate future reclamation. In this way it might <br /> be possible to avoid disturbing the permanent stock pile areas <br /> entirely. we agreed over the phone that map representations of <br /> actual configurations would be submitted in the 1988 annual <br /> report to 14LRD for the sunnysids operation. XG. Farrell was <br /> informed that the core analyses and an acid drainage mitigative <br /> plan would still be submitted before any rock was deposited at <br /> the permanent waste-rock disposal sites of Exhibit C-1 . <br /> Preliminary information to this effect was submitted to MLRD on <br /> July 12, 1988. My notes on this conversation are attached. No <br /> written correspondence was prepared by either party. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.