My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1976-05-03_HYDROLOGY - M1977378
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1976-05-03_HYDROLOGY - M1977378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2020 10:22:11 AM
Creation date
8/23/2012 7:13:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
5/3/1976
Doc Name
Geotechnical Investigation- Tailings Pond #3
From
F. M. Fox & Assoc. Inc.
To
Standard Metals
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We have also investigated the risks of potential instability of the embankment <br /> from seismic problems. Information from the National Earthquake Center indicates <br /> that the latest earthquake in the Four Corners Area was epicentered at North <br /> Latitude 370 and West Longitude 1070, on January 22, 1966. This quake had <br /> an intensity of 7.0 on the Mercalli scale and was felt in the Durango- <br /> Silverton Area. Modern practice in tailings disposal has shown that sand tailings <br /> placed at over 60% relative density are not severely subject to sand <br /> liquifaction upon vibration. The data gathered during the field and laboratory <br /> work indicates relative densities of the sand tailings of 67% to over 100% <br /> were encountered. It is our opinion that sand tailings have sufficient <br /> density against a potential liquifaction problem. However, not all earthquake <br /> failures are of the sand liquifaction type, and a "circular" failure could <br /> possibly result because of vibration. <br /> Based on the above analysis, it is our opinion that increasing the <br /> height of the pond more than an additional 6 feet would reduce the factor <br /> of safety beyond acceptable limits. <br /> E? <br /> If it is desired to continue use of the pond additional stability should <br /> be added to the existing embankment. This can be accomplished by one of the <br /> three following methods. <br /> 1 . The existing embankment material and/or sand tailings can be built <br /> pp at a flatter angle to provide additional stability. This angle should <br /> be approximately 2.5 to 1 , (i .e. horizontal to vertical ), and the sand <br /> tailings should be compacted as they are placed to at least 95% of Proctor <br /> Density ASTM D-1557. <br /> r^. <br /> 2. An additional berm of earth could be placed at the toe of the fill <br /> embankment to increase the stability. This addition should make the <br /> • -7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.