My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-01-04_INSPECTION - M1977378 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1977378
>
1988-01-04_INSPECTION - M1977378 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2021 12:53:14 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 12:18:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977378
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
1/4/1988
Doc Name
Responses
From
Sunnyside Gold Corp.
To
MLRD
Inspection Date
10/28/1987
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ponds; flow too meager) . A proposal should be made to <br /> the Division concerning this request. <br /> Response: <br /> Seepage occurs from the native ground surface below the <br /> toe of the rock dump at the American Tunnel , and it has <br /> been labeled seep no. 2 in the 112 permit application. <br /> Seepage at this site emanates from native ground, not <br /> the waste/soil boundary or the waste itself. <br /> Therefore, it is apparent that no phreatic surface <br /> exists in the dump itself. The existence of seep no. <br /> 1, to the south of the rock dump, is evidence that <br /> emergent groundwater flow occurs at this site <br /> naturally. The highest rate of surface discharge from <br /> seep no. 2 occurs during spring, and it is too low to <br /> measure with meter, flume, or bucket . As spring wears <br /> on to summer, all visible surface flow ends , leaving a <br /> small stagnant pool of water (approximately two to <br /> three gallons ) . Evaporation and biological processes <br /> are constantly at work on this stagnant water, and the <br /> water quality may bear no resemblance to waters in the <br /> shallow subsurface. <br /> As was noted in question no. 5 from the Division, the <br /> seepage quantities from seep no. 2 are too low to be <br /> physically handled. Indeed the only way to sample this <br /> water without disturbing and entraining sediment is <br /> with the use of a syringe. Given that these seeps <br /> probably predate the placement of the rock dump, and <br /> that they are unrelated to the mining operation (as are <br /> numerous other naturally occurring acid, iron rich <br /> bogs) , Sunnyside Gold Corp. sees no constructive <br /> advantage to sampling seep no. 2 or seep no. 1 . For <br /> these reasons SGC requests they be removed from the <br /> approved monitoring program for the Sunnyside Mine. <br /> Question: <br /> 6 . Mill : Mill discharge (drainage-spills , cleanup, etc . ) <br /> reports to the "Little Duck Pond" and seeps. This flow <br /> should be discharged along with the other mill <br /> discharges, pursuant to the NPDES permit (decants at TP <br /> #4) . Please discuss. <br /> Response: <br /> All waters draining from the floor of the mill are to <br /> be collected at a sump which will discharge to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.